The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fast and frugal forecasting
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650 · Cited by 3,504
Self-citationOptimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/ N Portfolio Strategy?
DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm075 · Cited by 3,199
Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic.
Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.75 · Cited by 1,352
Self-citationCounting Your Customers: Who-Are They and What Will They Do Next?
Schmittlein, D. C., Morrison, D. G., & Colombo, R. (1987) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.33.1.1 · Cited by 679
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1975) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6 · Cited by 673
“Counting Your Customers” the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model
Fader, P. S., Hardie, B. G. S., & Lee, K. L. (2005) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0098 · Cited by 480
Can we predict customer lifetime value?
Malthouse, E. C., & Blattberg, R. C. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20027 · Cited by 248
The Impact of Empirical Accuracy Studies on Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
Fildes, R., & Makridakis, S. (1995) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1403481 · Cited by 172
Predicting the outcomes of National Football League games
Boulier, B. L., & Stekler, H. O. (2003) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(01)00144-3 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346 · Cited by 4,037
Self-citationManipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability
Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Goldstein, D. G., Hofman, J. M., Wortman Vaughan, J. W., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445315 · Cited by 728
Self-citationWüstenhagen, R., & Menichetti, E. (2012) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.050 · Cited by 505
Illusions in regression analysis
Armstrong, J. S. (2012) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.02.001 · Cited by 322
A Bayesian Cognition Approach to Improve Data Visualization
Kim, Y.-S., Walls, L. A., Krafft, P., & Hullman, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300912 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Forecasting
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 760-772
- ISSN
- 0169-2070 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099549054
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fast and frugal forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.010
- The paper
- Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Fast and frugal forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
