The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250921 · Cited by 8,767
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 8×
“A variety of models from different perspectives and at various levels have been developed to explain IT acceptance perceptions and behaviors: TAM (Davis, 1989; Davis et al., 1989), Computer Self-Efficacy (Compeau and Higgins, 1995a, b), Task–Technology Fit (Goodhue, 1995; Goodhue and Thompson, 1995), Motivational Mode…”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 · Cited by 2,669
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940
Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6 · Cited by 887
Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007 · Cited by 841
Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2019) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-08-2018-0368 · Cited by 851
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: an Empirical Investigation of Online Auction Users1
Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Giles, P. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409972 · Cited by 547
Toward Meaningful Engagement: A Framework for Design and Research of Gamified Information Systems1
Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.4.01 · Cited by 521
Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025 · Cited by 496
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, J. Y. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.006 · Cited by 382
Zhang, P. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.11 · Cited by 331
Self-citationFlandorfer, P. (2012) · International Journal of Population Research · doi:10.1155/2012/829835 · Cited by 257
Hoi, V. N. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761 · Cited by 250
Washington State University, Hess, T., Fuller, M., University of Massachusetts, A., Campbell, D., & Millsaps College (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00216 · Cited by 233
Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, M. (2016) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2016.05.005 · Cited by 180
Magni, M., Susan Taylor, M., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.03.004 · Cited by 173
Sellers’ Trust and Continued Use of Online Marketplaces
University of Arizona, & Sun, H. (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00226 · Cited by 136
Self-citationTowards a new model for green consumer behaviour: A self‐determination theory perspective
Gilal, F. G., Chandani, K., Gilal, R. G., Gilal, N. G., Gilal, W. G., & Channa, N. A. (2020) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2021 · Cited by 112
A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Song, Y., Yang, Y., & Cheng, P. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22041614 · Cited by 95
“Although TAM and UTAUT are robust and powerful models to predict users’ adop ‐ tion of technology, the explanatory powers differ from contexts [32,33].”
Mobile application user behavior in the developing countries: A survey in Iran
Hajiheydari, N., & Ashkani, M. (2018) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2018.05.004 · Cited by 73
PLS–SEM in business promotion strategies. A multigroup analysis of mobile coupon users using MICOM
Carranza, R., Díaz, E., Martín-Consuegra, D., & Fernández-Ferrín, P. (2020) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-12-2019-0726 · Cited by 72
Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams
Pennington, D. D. (2011) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-011-9134-2 · Cited by 35
Collaborative, cross-disciplinary learning and co-emergent innovation in eScience teams
Pennington, D. D. (2011) · Earth Science Informatics · doi:10.1007/s12145-011-0077-4 · Cited by 32
Lamela, D., Cabral, J., Coelho, S., & Jongenelen, I. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104076 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, H., & Zhang, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 53-78
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064491641
- Cited by
- 982
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 49.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
