Cited by 73Technology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer BehaviorMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Mobile application user behavior in the developing countries: A survey in Iran

Hajiheydari, Nastaran, Ashkani, Mahdi·2018·Information Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.is.2018.05.004

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hajiheydari, N., & Ashkani, M.
Affiliations
University of Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Hajiheydari, Nastaran
Venue
Information Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
77
Pages
22-33
ISSN
0306-4379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2805392139
Cited by
73
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mobile application adoption, user behavior, technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, trust, subjective norms, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, service quality, system quality, satisfaction, recommendation intention, developing countries, Iran

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review