Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A study of hotel employee behavioral intentions towards adoption of information technology

Lam, Terry, Cho, Vincent, Qu, Hailin·2007·International Journal of Hospitality Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.09.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.09.002

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Agarwal, 1999, Are individual differences germane to the Acceptance of new information technologies?, Decision Sciences, 30, 361, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baker, 1994, New perspectives on productivity in hotels: some advances and new direction, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 13, 297, 10.1016/0278-4319(94)90068-X · DOI
  3. Buick, 2003, Information technology in small Scottish hotels: is it working?, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality, 15, 243, 10.1108/09596110310475711 · DOI
  4. Buttle, 1996, Hotel Marketing Strategy and The Theory of Reasoned Action, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 8, 5, 10.1108/09596119610115943 · DOI
  5. Byrd, 2001, An exploratory examination of the relationship between flexible IT infrastructure and competitive advantage, Information and Management, 39, 41, 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00078-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Compeau, 1995, Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test, MIS Quarterly, 19, 189, 10.2307/249688 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Conner, 2001, Why do women use dietary supplements? The use of the theory of planned behaviour to explore beliefs about their use, Social Science and Medicine, 52, 621, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00165-9 · DOI
  8. Davis, 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 982, 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dishaw, 1999, Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs, Information and Management, 36, 9, 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Goodhue, 2000, User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance, Information and Management, 38, 87, 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00057-4 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hasan, 2003, The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs, Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 443, 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00079-1 · DOI
  12. Hayashi, 2004, The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems, Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 139
  13. Heine, 2003, The relationship between technology and performance: a meta-analysis of technology models, Omega The International Journal of Management Science, 10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00026-4 · DOI
  14. Hill, 1987, Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: the case of computers, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307, 10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.307 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hoof, 1995, Technology needs and perceptions, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration, 64
  16. Igbaria, 1995, The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage, Omega International Journal of Management Science, 23, 587, 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Karahanna, 1999, Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs, MIS Quarterly, 23, 183, 10.2307/249751 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Law, 2005, A study of hotel information technology applications, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality, 17, 170, 10.1108/09596110510582369 · DOI
  19. Lee, 1999, People matter: commitment to employees, strategy and performance in Korean firms, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 579, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199906)20:6<579::AID-SMJ37>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  20. Liao, Z., Landry Jr., R., 2000. An empirical study on organizational acceptance of new information systems in a commercial back environment. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-2000.
  21. Lucas, 1999, Technology use and performance: a field study of broker workstations, Decisions Sciences, 30, 291, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01611.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. Marakas, 1998, The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: toward a clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research, Information Systems Research, 9, 126, 10.1287/isre.9.2.126 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Moon, 2001, Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context, Information and Management, 38, 217, 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Morris, 2001, Assessing users’ subjective quality of experience with the World Wide Web: an exploratory examination of temporal changes in technology acceptance, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 877, 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0460 · DOI
  25. Palmer, 1993, Creating a technological circle of service, Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly, 34, 81, 10.1177/001088049303400113 · DOI
  26. Powell, 1997, Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business and technology resources, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 375, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  27. Roepke, 2000, Aligning the IT human resource with business vision: the leadership initiative at 3M, MIS Quarterly, 24, 327, 10.2307/3250941 · DOI
  28. Ross, 1996, Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets, MIT Sloan Management Review, 38, 31
  29. Sheppard, 1988, The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 325, 10.1086/209170 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Siguaw, 1999, Best practices in information technology, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 40, 58, 10.1177/001088049904000510 · DOI
  31. Thompson, 1996, Strategic and competitive success: towards a model of the comprehensively competent organization, Management Decision, 34, 5, 10.1108/00251749610110274 · DOI
  32. Van Hoof, 1996, Information technology revisited—international lodging-industry technology needs and perceptions: a comparative study, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 37, 86, 10.1177/001088049603700613 · DOI
  33. Venkatesh, 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46, 186, 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Zahra, 1993, Business strategy, technology policy, and firm performance, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 451, 10.1002/smj.4250140605 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lam, T., Cho, V., & Qu, H.
Venue
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
49-65
ISSN
0278-4319 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijhm.2005.09.002
OpenAlex
W2020987965
Cited by
268
References
10
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.