Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type

Wu, Kewen, Zhao, Yuxiang, Zhu, Qinghua, Tan, Xiaojie, Zheng, Hua·2011·International Journal of Information Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Allen, 2003, Vertical trust/mistrust during information strategy formation, International Journal of Information Management, 23, 223, 10.1016/S0268-4012(03)00026-4 · DOI
  2. Bakker, 2006, Is trust really social capital? Knowledge sharing in product development projects, The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 13, 594, 10.1108/09696470610705479 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bart, 2005, Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large scale exploratory empirical study, Journal of Marketing, 69, 133, 10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.133 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brown, 2002, Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology, European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 283, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Burnett, 1986, An appraisal of the use of student subjects in marketing research, Journal of Business Research, 14, 329, 10.1016/0148-2963(86)90024-X · DOI
  6. Cohen, 1988, Vol. 2
  7. Evil, 2003, On trust in the internet: Belief cues from domain suffixes and seals of approval, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 47, 1346, 10.1177/154193120304701106 · doi:10.1177/154193120304701106
  8. Gächter, 2004, Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: Survey and experimental evidence, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55, 505, 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gefen, 2000, e-Commerce: The role of familiarity and trust, Omega, 28, 725, 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gefen, 2004, What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness, Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 263, 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045792 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gefen, 2000, The relative importance of perceived ease of use in is adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1, 10.17705/1jais.00008 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gefen, 2003, Managing user trust in B2c e-services, e-Service Journal, 2, 7, 10.2979/esj.2003.2.2.7 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Glaeser, 2000, Measuring trust, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811, 10.1162/003355300554926 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hong, 2008, Understanding the behavior of mobile data services consumers, Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 431, 10.1007/s10796-008-9096-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hsu, 2008, Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation, Information & Management, 45, 65, 10.1016/j.im.2007.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Igbaria, 1995, The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage, Omega, 23, 587, 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Igbaria, 1995, Why do individuals use computer technology?, A Finnish Case Study Information & Management, 29, 227
  18. King, 2006, A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management, 43, 740, 10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kraiger, 1985, On learning from the past: A meta-analytic fable, Personnel Psychology, 38, 799, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00566.x · DOI
  20. Lean, 2009, Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia, International Journal of Information Management, 29, 458, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Levitt, 2007, What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153, 10.1257/jep.21.2.153 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Liao, 2006, The roles of habit and web site quality in e-commerce, International Journal of Information Management, 26, 469, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lin, 2000, Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site, International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197, 10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00005-0 · DOI · Paper page
  24. McKnight, 1998, Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships, The Academy of Management Review, 23, 473, 10.2307/259290 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Nakagawa, 2007, Effect size confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists, Biological Reviews, 82, 591, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nysveen, 2005, Intentions to use mobile services: Antecedents and cross-service comparisons, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 330, 10.1177/0092070305276149 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Schepers, 2007, A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects, Information & Management, 44, 90, 10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Suh, 2002, Effect of trust on customer acceptance of internet banking, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1, 247, 10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00017-0 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tan, 2001, Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, 61
  30. Venkatesh, 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46, 186, 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Wachter, 2000, It takes a village: Virtual communities in support of education, International Journal of Information Management, 20, 473, 10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00039-6 · DOI
  32. Wu, 2005, An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 62, 784, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Wu, 2009, A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance, MIS Quarterly, 33, 419, 10.2307/20650298 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Wu, 2007, The effects of trust and enjoyment on intention to play online games, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8, 128
  35. Yoo, 2001, Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet shopping site (sitequal), Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2, 31
  36. Yousafzai, 2007, Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 1, Journal of Modelling in Management, 2, 251, 10.1108/17465660710834453 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H.
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
572-581
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
OpenAlex
W2069610731
Cited by
389
References
16
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.