Cited by 1,074Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Managing User Trust in B2C e-Services

Gefen, Straub·2003·e-Service Journal

Abstract

One of the major differences between B2C e-services (Business to Consumer Internet-based services) and the more traditional types of consumer services is that websites of e-services frequently lack the social presence of the physical services. This lack of social presence may impede the growth of B2C by hindering the development of consumer trust in the service provider. Human interaction, or at least the belief that the system has characteristics of social presence, is believed to be critical in the creation of trust. Trust itself is a major issue affecting the phenomenal growth rate of e-commerce, according to industry sources and recent academic studies. This study examines the effect of social presence on consumer trust in e-services and the relative importance of consumer trust in comparison with the widely studied TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) beliefs. In a free simulation experiment, 161 MBA student subjects assessed Travelocity.com, a popular online travel agency. Findings show that social presence, indeed, affects consumer trust and that trust subsequently has a stronger effect on purchase intentions than TAM beliefs. Implications for e-services are discussed in terms of whether the benefits from adopting an IT depend more on website characteristics like usefulness and ease of use or on consumer trust in the vendor. Managing e-services calls for managing the trust that is engendered in the customer experience on the website. Firms that excel in instilling high degrees of social presence in their websites may prosper more than those that do not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2979/esj.2003.2.2.7

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gefen, & Straub
Venue
e-Service Journal
Published
2003
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
7
ISSN
1528-8226 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166061228
Cited by
1,074
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 65
FWCI
55.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
e-Service Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
consumer trust, social presence, e-commerce, technology acceptance model, purchase intention, online travel agencies, website usability, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review