The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain
Abstract
Abstract Blockchain Technology (BT) has led to a disruption in the supply chain by removing the trust related issues. Studies are being conducted worldwide to leverage the benefits provided by BT in improving the performance of the supply chains. The literature reveals BT to offer various benefits leading to improvements in the sustainable performance of the agriculture supply chains (ASC). It is expected that BT will bring a paradigm shift in the way the transactions are carried in the ASC by reducing the high number of intermediaries, delayed payments and high transaction lead times. India, a developing economy, caters to the food security needs of an ever-growing population and faces many challenges affecting ASC sustainability. It is therefore essential to adopt BT in the ASC to leverage the various benefits. In this study, we identify and establish the relationships between the enablers of BT adoption in ASC. Thirteen enablers were identified from the literature and validated by the experts before applying a combined Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) methodology to envision the complex causal relationships between the identified BT enablers. The findings from the study suggest that, among the identified enablers, traceability was the most significant reason for BT implementation in ASC followed by auditability, immutability, and provenance. The findings of the study will help the practitioners to design the strategies for BT implementation in agriculture, creating a real-time data-driven ASC. The results will also help the policymakers in developing policies for faster implementation of BT ensuring food safety and sustainable ASCs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W. (2016) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0574-6 · Cited by 1,240
The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency
Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics2010002 · Cited by 951
Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia
Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2580664 · Cited by 928
Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains
Kouhizadeh, M., & Sarkis, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10103652 · Cited by 726
Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems
Yuan, Y., & Wang, F.-Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2016.7795984 · Cited by 671
Toward an ontology‐driven blockchain design for supply‐chain provenance
Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2018) · Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management · doi:10.1002/isaf.1424 · Cited by 652
Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary?
Atzori, M. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2709713 · Cited by 506
Information Sharing for Supply Chain Management Based on Block Chain Technology
Nakasumi, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) · doi:10.1109/cbi.2017.56 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Dutta, P., Choi, T.-M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067 · Cited by 1,545
Blockchain in Agriculture Traceability Systems: A Review
Demestichas, K., Peppes, N., Alexakis, T., & Adamopoulou, E. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10124113 · Cited by 412
Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology—A Systematic Literature Review
Păvăloaia, V.-D., & Necula, S.-C. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12051102 · Cited by 290
Tsolakis, N., Niedenzu, D., Simonetto, M., Dora, M., & Kumar, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.003 · Cited by 269
Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Hughes, D. L. (2022) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-07-2020-0460 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Sharma, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 101967
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2952858199
- Cited by
- 957
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 125.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.023
- The paper
- Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.