Cited by 194Information Technology Governance and StrategyCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsCorporate Management and Leadership

WHO led the digital transformation of your company? A reflection of IT related challenges during the pandemic

Open access
Papagiannidis, Savvas, Harris, Jonathan, Morton, David·2020·International Journal of Information Management

Abstract

In this paper we reflect on a number of IT related challenges during the COVID19 pandemic, primarily from a CIO and IT professionals perspective. We consider three time periods, namely the period before the pandemic, the response to the pandemic and the period after it. For each period we discuss the key challenges that practitioners faced and outline important areas to consider for the future. Hopefully, the lessons learnt and the experiences gained will positively inform future academic research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102166

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The key threads within this group of perspectives align with the observations in Papagiannidis et al. (2020) and Barnes (2020) on the ability of humans and organisations to change their behaviours and role of technology in making real change within a societal context.

    “The key threads within this group of perspectives align with the observations in Papagiannidis et al. (2020) and Barnes (2020) on the ability of humans and organisations to change their behaviours and role of technology in making real change within a societal context.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papagiannidis, S., Harris, J., & Morton, D.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Papagiannidis, Savvas
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
55
Pages
102166
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033584866
Cited by
194
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 9
FWCI
42.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, digital transformation, IT challenges, IT professionals, lessons learned, future of information technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review