Cited by 22Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatmentElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Antipsychotic treatment of psychotic disorders in forensic psychiatry: Patients’ perception of coercion and its predictors

Horvath, Juliane, Steinert, Tilman, Jaeger, Susanne·2018·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Despite the major encroachment of coercive measures on the fundamental rights of affected forensic psychiatric patients, there is relatively few research done in this field. Considering the relevance of this subject for psychiatric care and the recent changes of the legal basis of coercive treatment in Germany, more studies are needed. The present study examines forensic psychiatric inpatients' perception of coercion regarding the prescribed antipsychotic medication and factors associated with the perception of coercion.Material and methods Patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders in two forensic psychiatric institutions in Southern Germany were interviewed about their experience of coercion related to antipsychotic medication. Due to a lack of appropriate psychometric scales, the perception of coercion regarding antipsychotic medication was assessed using an adapted version of the MacArthur Admission Experience Survey (aAES). The influence of sociodemographic and illness-related factors, of the attitude towards medication, insight into illness and symptom severity on the extent to which patients felt coerced to take the prescribed medication was analyzed. Two Visual Analog Scales, the Drug Attitude Inventory DAI-10, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale PANSS, the Fragebogen zur Krankheitseinsicht (Questionnaire about insight into illness) FKE-10 and the Coercion Experience Scale CES were used as psychometric scales.Results 50% of all patients eligible for the study gave their written consent. 70% of all participants had experienced coercive measures between admission and time of data assessment. The DAI-10 and the aAES correlated moderately, a high level of insight into illness being correlated to less perceived coercion. The FKE-10 and the aAES correlated moderately as well, a high level of insight into illness being correlated to less perceived coercion. The severity of symptoms (PANSS score) and the level of perceived coercion (aAES score) correlated weakly, participants with more severe symptoms perceived more coercion than those with less marked symptoms. A linear regression model showed that to what extent patients felt coerced to take the prescribed antipsychotic medication was mainly influenced by their attitude towards medication and the degree of insight into illness, to a lesser extent by symptom severity (R 2 = 0.565, p < 0.001). Sociodemographic factors were not related to the extent to which patients felt coerced to take the antipsychotic medication.Conclusions Predictors of the experience of coercion related to the prescribed antipsychotic medication of forensic psychiatric inpatients with schizophrenia and related disorders are not so much sociodemographic or illness-related factors as education or past medical history, but rather potentially influenceable variables such as insight into illness or attitude towards medication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.02.004

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horvath, J., Steinert, T., & Jaeger, S.
Affiliations
Zentrum für Psychiatrie Südwürttemberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Horvath, Juliane
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
57
Pages
113-121
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792316511
Cited by
22
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, antipsychotic drugs, forensic psychiatric inpatients, involuntary treatment, schizophrenia, schizotypal personality disorder, delusional disorder, insight into illness, symptom severity, patient experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Germany, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotic Disorders, Restraint, Physical, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review