Cited by 47Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Are depot antipsychotics more coercive than tablets?: The patient’s perspective

Patel, MX, de Zoysa, N., Bernadt, M., Bindman, J., David, AS·2010·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Some clinicians consider depot antipsychotics to be stigmatising, coercive and unacceptable to patients. This cross-sectional study investigated patients' perspectives of coercion for depot and oral antipsychotics. In all, 72 participants with chronic mental illness on voluntary maintenance antipsychotic medication were interviewed for their views on oral and depot medication and experiences of coercion. The MacArthur Admission Experience (short form) was adapted to explore coercion regarding medication. Mean total coercion levels were higher for those on depot (depot: mean 4.39; oral: 2.80, P = 0.027), as were perceived coercion (2.52 vs 1.73, P = 0.041) and negative pressures subscales (1.17 vs 0.33, P = 0.009). No significant differences were found for the 'voice' subscale and affective reactions. Specifically, more participants on depot felt that people try to force them to take medication (30% vs 2%, P< 0.001). Depots were perceived as more coercive than oral antipsychotics. Greater perceived coercion may explain why some consider depots to be a more stigmatising form of treatment. Although forced medication is sometimes required, the experience of coercion should be minimised by giving patients a fair say in treatment decisions, regardless of formulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881109103133

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, M., de Zoysa, N., Bernadt, M., Bindman, J., & David, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
Corresponding author
Patel, MX
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2009-03-20
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
1483-1489
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2134571508
Cited by
47
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cilag
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
long-acting injectable antipsychotics, oral antipsychotics, coercion, patient perspectives, chronic mental illness, involuntary medication, stigma, treatment decision-making
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Coercion, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delayed-Action Preparations, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Social Perception, Tablets, Antipsychotic Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review