Cited by 33Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Clinical correlates and predictors of perceived coercion among psychiatric inpatients: A prospective pilot study

Gowda, Guru S., Noorthoorn, Eric O., Kumar, Channaveerachari Naveen, Nanjegowda, Raveesh Bevinahalli, Math, Suresh Bada·2016·Asian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The current Mental Health Care Bill (MHCB) -2013 in India advocates least restrictive alternatives (LRA) in psychiatric treatment. However, we have little evidence on patient's perspectives of coercion and LRA. Methodology This was a hospital-based prospective pilot study. 170 subjects chosen by computer-generated random number sampling were screened. In 83 eligible subjects, all assessments including coercion assessment were completed within 3 days of admission and in 75 subjects reassessment was done within 3 days of discharge. Results Perceived coercion as measured by the MacArthur Perceived Coercion Scale (MPCS) decreased significantly from 3.72±1.98 at admission to 1.77±1.8 ( Conclusion Coercion is a dynamic state and changes with treatment and care. Clinical care may result in an improvement in global functioning, insight as well as in reduction in severity of illness consequently leading to less coercion. During the time of discharge, majority of patients reported that their admission was justified, even though they felt coerced during hospital stay and agreed for treatment against their will within a safe, standardised coercive practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.04.004

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gowda, G. S., Noorthoorn, E. O., Kumar, C. N., Nanjegowda, R. B., & Math, S. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN)
  • GGNet (NL)
Corresponding author
Gowda, Guru S.
Venue
Asian Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
22
Pages
34-40
ISSN
1876-2018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2344819615
Cited by
32
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, psychiatric inpatients, least restrictive alternative, insight, global functioning, symptom severity, family structure, socioeconomic status, employment status, involuntary psychiatric admission
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Humans, India, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Admission, Patient Discharge, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review