Cited by 167Electronic Health Records SystemsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: A case study employing the FITT framework

TSIKNAKIS, M, KOUROUBALI, A·2009·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Objective The paper presents an application of the "Fit between Individuals, Task and Technology" (FITT) framework to analyze the socio-organizational-technical factors that influence IT adoption in the healthcare domain.Method The FITT framework was employed as the theoretical instrument for a retrospective analysis of a 15-year effort in implementing IT systems and eHealth services in the context of a Regional Health Information Network in Crete. Quantitative and qualitative research methods, interviews and participant observations were employed to gather data from a case study that involved the entire region of Crete.Results The detailed analysis of the case study based on the FITT framework, showed common features, but also differences of IT adoption within the various health organizations. The emerging picture is a complex nexus of factors contributing to IT adoption, and multi-level interventional strategies to promote IT use.Conclusion The work presented in this paper shows the applicability of the FITT framework in explaining the complexity of aspects observed in the implementation of healthcare information systems. The reported experiences reveal that fit management can be viewed as a system with a feedback loop that is never really stable, but ever changing based on external factors or deliberate interventions. Management of fit, therefore, becomes a constant and complex task for the whole life cycle of IT systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.001

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceived usefulness was influenced by perceived ease of use, eHealth and business process alignment, end user involvement, management commitment and support to change, health care provider-patient relationship, and IT experience and knowledge.

    “whereas their perceived usefulness was influenced by the perceived ease of use, eHealth and business process alignment, end user involvement, management commitment and support to change, health care provider-patient relationship, and IT experience and knowledge [25,28,33,56,77,83,86-88].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
TSIKNAKIS, M., & KOUROUBALI, A.
Affiliations
Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Corresponding author
TSIKNAKIS, M
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
39-52
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965756895
Cited by
167
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
digital health adoption, health information technology adoption, organizational factors, regional health information networks, health information systems, IT implementation, multilevel interventions, Crete
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Cooperative Behavior, Emergency Medical Services, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Medical Informatics, Medical Records, Primary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review