Cited by 22Technology Use by Older AdultsHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Barriers to technology use among older heart failure individuals in managing their symptoms after hospital discharge

Nguyen, Linda, Keshavjee, Karim, Archer, Norm, Patterson, Christopher, Gwadry-Sridhar, Femida, Demers, Catherine·2017·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Background In North America, heart failure (HF) is the leading cause for hospital readmission. Supportive technology, such as computers and tablets, could potentially assist patients with self-care to manage their condition after hospital discharge; however, older individuals have difficulties in adopting technology to manage their condition.Method This study used a mixed methods design to identify barriers to technology use in HF self-care. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 HF patients and 10 informal caregivers or care partners (CP). In the quantitative phase, five questionnaires were administered to 15 patients and 8 CP: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Short Literacy Survey and Subjective Numeracy Scale; Self-Care of HF Index; Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire; and Patient Activation Measure.Results In the qualitative phase, five themes emerged regarding engagement in self care and technology use: knowledge level of HF; level of willingness to ask questions related to HF; confidence level in making health-related decisions individually; level of technology usage in daily activities; and self-recording of health measurements. Quantitative analysis found that most HF patients had mild cognitive impairment (MCI), adequate health numeracy levels to understand and manage their health condition, high confidence levels in managing their condition and willingness to engage in self-care. There was variation in willingness to adopt technology.Conclusion Patients were willing to engage in HF self-care however they relied on CPs who were more willing to ask questions about HF. Technology tools may assist in HF self-care, but they must be tailored for use among older individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.06.001

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, L., Keshavjee, K., Archer, N., Patterson, C., Gwadry-Sridhar, F., & Demers, C.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Demers, Catherine
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
105
Pages
136-142
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2624920485
Cited by
22
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
heart failure, older adults, technology adoption barriers, self-care, post-discharge care, hospital readmission, informal caregivers, health numeracy, cognitive impairment, patient activation, health information technology, symptom management
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Caregivers, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review