Cited by 18Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Evaluating GenAI systems to combat mental health issues in healthcare workers: An integrative literature review

Levin, C., Naimi, E., Saban, M.·2024·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Background Mental health issues among healthcare workers remain a serious problem globally. Recent surveys continue to report high levels of depression, anxiety, burnout and other conditions amongst various occupational groups. Novel approaches are needed to support clinician well-being. Objective This integrative literature review aims to explore the current state of research examining the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and machine learning (ML) systems to predict mental health issues and identify associated risk factors amongst healthcare professionals. Methods A literature search of databases was conducted in Medline then adapted as necessary to Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed and CINAHL with Full Text. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. Results Nine studies employed various machine learning techniques to predict different mental health outcomes among healthcare workers. Models showed good predictive performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.82 to 0.904 for outcomes such as depression, anxiety and safety perceptions. Key risk factors identified included fatigue, stress, burnout, workload, sleep issues and lack of support. Two studies explored the potential of sensor-based technologies and GenAI analysis of physiological data. None of the included studies focused on the use of GenAI systems specifically for providing mental health support to healthcare workers. Conclusion Preliminary research demonstrates that AI/ML models can effectively predict mental health issues. However, more work is needed to evaluate the real-world integration and impact of these tools, including GenAI systems, in identifying clinician distress and supporting well-being over time. Further research should aim to explore how GenAI may be developed and applied to provide mental health support for healthcare workers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105566

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing scholarly literature on GenAI's application in healthcare often focuses almost exclusively on technical performance indicators such as accuracy rates, time efficiency, and comparative error reduction against human benchmarks.

    “Existing scholarly literature17–22 on GenAI’s application in healthcare often focuses almost exclusively on technical performance indicators such as accuracy rates, time efficiency, and comparative error reduction against human benchmarks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, C., Naimi, E., & Saban, M.
Affiliations
  • Jerusalem College of Technology (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Saban, M.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
191
Pages
105566
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401159027
Cited by
17
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
generative AI, machine learning, mental health prediction, healthcare workers, clinician well-being, burnout, depression, anxiety, occupational stress, workload, risk factors, sensor-based monitoring, physiological signals, clinician distress
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Anxiety, Artificial Intelligence, Mental Disorders, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review