Cited by 53Digital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Developing, Implementing, and Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence-Guided Mental Health Resource Navigation Chatbot for Health Care Workers and Their Families During and Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Study

Open access
Noble, Jasmine M, Zamani, Ali, Gharaat, MohamadAli, Merrick, Dylan, Maeda, Nathanial, Lambe Foster, Alex, Nikolaidis, Isabella, Goud, Rachel +8 more·2022·JMIR Research Protocols

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 3 Canadians will experience an addiction or mental health challenge at some point in their lifetime. Unfortunately, there are multiple barriers to accessing mental health care, including system fragmentation, episodic care, long wait times, and insufficient support for health system navigation. In addition, stigma may further reduce an individual's likelihood of seeking support. Digital technologies present new and exciting opportunities to bridge significant gaps in mental health care service provision, reduce barriers pertaining to stigma, and improve health outcomes for patients and mental health system integration and efficiency. Chatbots (ie, software systems that use artificial intelligence to carry out conversations with people) may be explored to support those in need of information or access to services and present the opportunity to address gaps in traditional, fragmented, or episodic mental health system structures on demand with personalized attention. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated even further the need for mental health support among Canadians and called attention to the inefficiencies of our system. As health care workers and their families are at an even greater risk of mental illness and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, this technology will be first piloted with the goal of supporting this vulnerable group. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mental Health Intelligent Information Resource Assistant in supporting health care workers and their families in the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Nova Scotia with the provision of appropriate information on mental health issues, services, and programs based on personalized needs. METHODS: The effectiveness of the technology will be assessed via voluntary follow-up surveys and an analysis of client interactions and engagement with the chatbot. Client satisfaction with the chatbot will also be assessed. RESULTS: This project was initiated on April 1, 2021. Ethics approval was granted on August 12, 2021, by the University of Alberta Health Research Board (PRO00109148) and on April 21, 2022, by the Nova Scotia Health Authority Research Ethics Board (1027474). Data collection is anticipated to take place from May 2, 2022, to May 2, 2023. Publication of preliminary results will be sought in spring or summer 2022, with a more comprehensive evaluation completed by spring 2023 following the collection of a larger data set. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings can be incorporated into public policy and planning around mental health system navigation by Canadian mental health care providers-from large public health authorities to small community-based, not-for-profit organizations. This may serve to support the development of an additional touch point, or point of entry, for individuals to access the appropriate services or care when they need them, wherever they are. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/33717.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/33717

Cites

68 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI chatbots facilitate well-designed multimodal conversations that can effectively assist in patient intervention, postoperative support, and psychiatric care.

    “Previous studies have revealed that AI chatbots facilitate well-designed multimodal conversations that can effectively assist in a variety of areas such as patient intervention (8), postoperative support (9), and psychiatric care (10)”

    From Digital affordances of AI chatbots in nursing education: a systematic review of learning gains and gaps in the evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction’s “Opportunities for Health Chatbots” section describes conversational chatbots as promising for mental health care, and “Chatbot Development” describes MIRA’s text and button-based exchanges. But this is a study protocol: the Introduction says evidence of effectiveness for mental health navigation is limited. It does not establish that multimodal conversations effectively assist psychiatric care. The citations for patient intervention and postoperative support are attached to other parts of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior to the ChatGPT era, several papers described adaptations of AI Chatbots by specific medical disciplines, with promising initial results.

    “Prior to the ChatGPT era, several papers described adaptations of AI Chatbots by specific medical disciplines, with promising initial results [35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [2]Pearson C Janz T Ali J Mental and substance use disorders in Canada Statistics Canada 2015 2021-09-15 https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/82-624-x/2013001/article/11855-eng.pdf?st=d8oRDqRq
  2. [16]Chappell NL McDonald L Stones M Aging in Contemporary Canada. 2nd edition 2008 Toronto, ON, Canada Pearson-Prentice Hall
  3. [27]WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard World Health Organization 2021-07-19 https://covid19.who.int/ 37184163

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noble, J. M., Zamani, A., Gharaat, M., Merrick, D., Maeda, N., Lambe Foster, A., Nikolaidis, I., Goud, R., Stroulia, E., Agyapong, V. I. O., Greenshaw, A. J., Lambert, S., Gallson, D., Porter, K., Turner, D., & Zaiane, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • Mood Disorders Society of Canada (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2022-07-25
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
e33717
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285364236
Cited by
53
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Alberta
  • Mitacs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
chatbots, healthcare workers, COVID-19 pandemic, mental health stigma, artificial intelligence, Alberta, Nova Scotia, psychological distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review