Cited by 38Clinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionMedication Adherence and Compliance

Adherence to a guideline on cardiovascular prevention: A comparison between general practitioners and practice nurses

Voogdt-Pruis, Helene R., Van Ree, Jan W., Gorgels, Anton P.M., Beusmans, George H.M.I.·2011·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Patient non-compliance with prescribed treatment is an important factor in the lack of success in cardiovascular prevention. Another important cause is non-adherence of caregivers to the guidelines. It is not known how doctors and nurses differ in the application of guidelines. Patient compliance to treatment may vary according to the type of caregiver.Objective To compare adherence to cardiovascular prevention delivered by practice nurses and by general practitioners.Setting Six primary health care centres in the Netherlands (25 general practitioners, six practice nurses).Methods 701 high risk patients were included in a randomised trial. Half of the patients received nurse-delivered care and half received care by general practitioners. For 91% of the patients treatment concerned secondary prevention. The Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention was used as protocol. A structured self-administered questionnaire was sent by post to patients. Data were extracted from the practice database and the questionnaire.Results Intervention was received by 77% of respondents who visited the practice nurse compared to 57% from the general practitioner group (OR = 2.56, p < 0.01). More lifestyle intervention was given by the practice nurse; 46% of patients received at least one lifestyle intervention (weight, diet, exercise, and smoking) compared to 13% in general practitioner group (OR = 3.24, p < 0.001). In addition, after one year more patients from the practice nurse group used cardiovascular drugs (OR = 1.9, p = 0.03). Nurses inquired more frequently about patient compliance to medical treatment (OR = 2.1, p < 0.01). Regarding patient compliance, no statistical difference between study groups in this trial was found.Conclusion Practice nurses adhered better to the Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention than general practitioners did. Lifestyle intervention advice was more frequently given by practice nurses. Improvement of cardiovascular prevention is still necessary. Both caregivers should inquire about patient adherence on a regular basis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.11.008

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voogdt-Pruis, H. R., Van Ree, J. W., Gorgels, A. P. M., & Beusmans, G. H. M. I.
Affiliations
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Voogdt-Pruis, Helene R.
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
798-807
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975552930
Cited by
38
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
cardiovascular disease prevention, guideline adherence, practice nurses, general practitioners, secondary prevention, lifestyle intervention, cardiovascular drugs, high-risk patients, primary care, nursing care delivery
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nurses, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Guideline Adherence, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review