Cited by 114Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionNursing Roles and PracticesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular risk management in primary care: a randomised trial

Open access
Voogdt-Pruis, Helene R, Beusmans, George HMI, Gorgels, Anton PM, Kester, Arnold DM, Van Ree, Jan W·2010·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A substantial part of cardiovascular disease prevention is delivered in primary care. Special attention should be paid to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors. According to the Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management, the heavy workload of cardiovascular risk management for GPs could be shared with advanced practice nurses. AIM: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of practice nurses acting as substitutes for GPs in cardiovascular risk management after 1 year of follow-up. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective pragmatic randomised trial. SETTING: Primary care in the south of the Netherlands. Six centres (25 GPs, six nurses) participated. METHOD: A total of 1626 potentially eligible patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease were randomised to a practice nurse group (n = 808) or a GP group (n = 818) in 2006. In total, 701 patients were included in the trial. The Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management was used as the protocol, with standardised techniques for risk assessment. Changes in the following risk factors after 1 year were measured: lipids, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. In addition, patients in the GP group received a brief questionnaire. RESULTS: A larger decrease in the mean level of risk factors was observed in the practice nurse group compared with the GP group. After controlling for confounders, only the larger decrease in total cholesterol in the practice nurse group was statistically significant (P = 0.01, two-sided). CONCLUSION: Advanced practice nurses are achieving results, equal to or better than GPs for the management of risk factors. The findings of this study support the involvement of practice nurses in cardiovascular risk management in Dutch primary care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp10x482095

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of nurse-led prevention clinics in primary care compared with usual care, with greater success in secondary as opposed to primary prevention.

    “Other studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of nurse-led prevention clinics in primary care compared with usual care, with greater success in secondary as opposed to primary prevention.532 -534”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: third joint task force of European and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2003; 10(4): S1-S10.
  2. Van Son L, Crebolder H, van Hoef L, Beusmans G. Supporting the GP [in Dutch]. Huisarts Wet 2004; 47(1): 15-21.
  3. Leenders F, Beusmans G, Swerts H, et al. A practice nurse for patients with cardiovascular diseases, an explorative study [in Dutch]. Tijdschr Praktijkond 2006; 1(2): 45-50.
  4. Torgerson DJ, Roland M. What is Zelen's design? BMJ 1998; 316(7131): 606.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voogdt-Pruis, H. R., Beusmans, G. H., Gorgels, A. P., Kester, A. D., & Van Ree, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
60
Issue
570
Pages
40-46
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W1998810223
Cited by
114
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
cardiovascular risk management, advanced practice nurses, practice nurses, general practitioners, cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor control, total cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, primary care, task shifting
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Nurse Practitioners, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Risk Management, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review