Cited by 542Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and BurnoutStress and Burnout Research

Compassion fatigue: A meta-narrative review of the healthcare literature.

Sinclair, Shane, Raffin-Bouchal, Shelley, Venturato, Lorraine, Mijovic-Kondejewski, Jane, Smith-MacDonald, Lorraine·2017·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Compassion fatigue describes a work-related stress response in healthcare providers that is considered a 'cost of caring' and a key contributor to the loss of compassion in healthcare. Objective The purpose of this review was to critically examine the construct of compassion fatigue and to determine if it is an accurate descriptor of work-related stress in healthcare providers and a valid target variable for intervention. Design Meta-narrative review. Data sources PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, Google Scholar, the grey literature, and manual searches of bibliographies. Review methods Seminal articles and theoretical and empirical studies on compassion fatigue in the healthcare literature were identified and appraised for their validity and relevance to our review. Sources were mapped according to the following criteria: 1) definitions; 2) conceptual analyses; 3) signs and symptoms; 4) measures; 5) prevalence and associated risk factors; and 6) interventions. A narrative account of included studies that critically examines the concept of compassion fatigue in healthcare was employed, and recommendations for practice, policy and further research were made. Results 90 studies from the nursing literature and healthcare in general were included in the review. Findings emphasized that the physical, emotional, social and spiritual health of healthcare providers is impaired by cumulative stress related to their work, which can impact the d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.003

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinclair, S., Raffin-Bouchal, S., Venturato, L., Mijovic-Kondejewski, J., & Smith-MacDonald, L.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, Shane
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
69
Pages
9-24
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2578834272
Cited by
542
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
compassion fatigue, healthcare workers, occupational stress, compassionate care, ProQOL, risk factors, intervention
MeSH terms
Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, Professional, Health Personnel, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review