Cited by 100Psychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsNursing education and management

Conceptualising nurse-patient therapeutic engagement on acute mental health wards: An integrative review

Open access
McAllister, Sarah, Robert, Glenn, Tsianakas, Vicki, McCrae, Niall·2019·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The review aimed to 1) explore the constituents of nurse-patient therapeutic engagement on acute mental health wards; 2) map factors that influence engagement to the Theoretical Domains Framework and 3) integrate results into a conceptual model of engagement to inform the development of interventions to improve engagement. DESIGN: A systematic integrative review using an established framework specific to the integrative review methodology. DATA SOURCES: Database searches (CINAHL, PsycINFO, BNI and Cochrane Library) and hand searching identified 3414 articles. After screening, applying eligibility criteria, and quality appraisal, 37 articles were included: n = 27 empirical research studies, n = 10 expert opinion pieces, n = 1 case study and n = 1 theoretical report. REVIEW METHODS: Peer-reviewed empirical studies, theoretical reports or expert opinion pieces that explored therapeutic engagement as a stated aim and were conducted in acute mental health inpatient settings from the patient or nurse perspective were included. Data were extracted from the introduction, results and discussion sections of empirical research, and the complete article of theoretical and expert opinion pieces. Data were coded then grouped into subthemes and themes. Data relating to influencing factors were further categorised according to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results were synthesised into a conceptual model of engagement. RESULTS: Five conceptually distinct, but closely related constructs of engagement - called the "Principles of Engagement" - emerged: 1) Understanding the person and their experiences; 2) Facilitating growth; 3) Therapeutic use of self; 4) Choosing the right approach and 5) Authoritative vs. emotional containment. Influences on engagement ranged across all 14 theoretical domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. CONCLUSION: A holistic understanding of the essential components of engagement may make it easier for nurses to recognise what they do, and to do it well. The model can be used to generate testable hypotheses about how and where to target behavioural change interventions. The Principles of Engagement must be reflected in the development of interventions to improve engagement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.013

Cites

95 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Connection and alliance with patients allow them to better understand their symptoms and achieve therapeutic adherence, which in turn helps stabilize their symptoms and reduce the burden on family members.

    “Connection and alliance with patients allow them to better understand their symptoms and achieve therapeutic adherence, which in turn helps stabilize their symptoms and reduce the burden on family members [89].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bowles, A., 2000. Therapeutic nursing care in acute psychiatric wards: engagement over control. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 7 (2), 179-184.
  2. Clark, L., 2012. The Therapeutic relationship and Mental Health Nursing: it is time to articulate what we do!. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 19 (9), 839-843 10.111/ j.1365-2850.2012.01944.x.
  3. a1655. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Department of Health, 2006. From values to action: The Chief Nursing Officer's review of mental health nursing. DH, London.
  5. Lawes, A., Marcus, E., Pilling, S., 2018. Report 1: What Staffing Structures of Mental Health Services are Associated with Improved Patient Outcomes? A Rapid Review. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAllister, S., Robert, G., Tsianakas, V., & McCrae, N.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
McAllister, Sarah
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
93
Pages
106-118
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2920548323
Cited by
100
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
Theoretical Domains Framework, therapeutic use of self, behaviour change interventions, nurse-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Nurse-Patient Relations, Patient Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review