Cited by 22Granular flow and fluidized bedsDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsMineral Processing and Grinding

On the role of API in determining porosity, pore structure and bulk modulus of the skeletal material in pharmaceutical tablets formed with MCC as sole excipient

Open access
Ridgway, Cathy, Bawuah, Prince, Markl, Daniel, Zeitler, J. Axel, Ketolainen, Jarkko, Peiponen, Kai-Erik, Gane, Patrick·2017·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

The physical properties and mechanical integrity of pharmaceutical tablets are of major importance when loading with active pharmaceutical ingredient(s) (API) in order to ensure ease of processing, control of dosage and stability during transportation and handling prior to patient consumption. The interaction between API and excipient, acting as functional extender and binder, however, is little understood in this context. The API indomethacin is combined in this study with microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) at increasing loading levels. Tablets from the defined API/MCC ratios are made under conditions of controlled porosity and tablet thickness, resulting from different compression conditions, and thus compaction levels. Mercury intrusion porosimetry is used to establish the accessible pore volume, pore size distribution and, adopting the observed region of elastic intrusion-extrusion at high pressure, an elastic bulk modulus of the skeletal material is recorded. Porosity values are compared to previously published values derived from terahertz (THz) refractive index data obtained from exactly the same tablet sample sets. It is shown that the elastic bulk modulus is dependent on API wt% loading under constant tablet preparation conditions delivering equal dimensions and porosity. The findings are considered of novel value in respect to establishing consistency of tablet production and optimisation of physical properties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.04.038

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mercury and helium porosimetry, the usual porosity techniques, take considerable time and damage the sample.

    “This may be due partly to the relatively time-consuming and destructive nature of existing conventional porosity measurement methods like mercury or helium porosimetry 16,29,30 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kathpalia, H., Sule, Patil, A., Mahadik, A., Sharma, K., 2014. Controlled release orally disintegrating tablets: A review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 7, 35-42.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ridgway, C., Bawuah, P., Markl, D., Zeitler, J. A., Ketolainen, J., Peiponen, K.-E., & Gane, P.
Affiliations
  • Omya (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Ridgway, Cathy
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
526
Issue
1-2
Pages
321-331
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605953191
Cited by
22
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mineral Processing and Grinding
Keywords
microcrystalline cellulose, tablet porosity, pore structure, indomethacin, compaction degree, terahertz refractive index, mercury intrusion porosimetry
MeSH terms
Cellulose, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Excipients, Pressure, Tablets, Porosity, Elastic Modulus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review