Cited by 159Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesSleep and related disorders

Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing in children

Boss, Emily F., Smith, David F., Ishman, Stacey L.·2011·International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Abstract

Objective Although racial/ethnic and socioeconomic healthcare disparities in pediatric primary care are widely documented, little is known regarding health disparities for common otolaryngic conditions. Pediatric sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is highly prevalent, associated with significant physical and neurocognitive sequelae, and a common reason for pediatric otolaryngology referral. We sought to synthesize information from published findings related to racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in children with SDB.Methods Qualitative systematic review of MEDLINE database for articles reporting on racial/ethnic or socioeconomic differences in prevalence, diagnosis or surgical treatment of SDB in children over 30 years.Results Of 210 abstracts identified, 33 met inclusion criteria. 24 articles directly addressed differences in race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, and 10 had findings which identified a disparity. Differences were identified in prevalence, sleep patterns, and sequelae of pediatric SDB (24/33) and in access to care and utilization of adenotonsillectomy (10/33). Black children (12/33) and children with socioeconomic deprivation (17/33) were the most common minority groups studied. Although conclusions were broad, common study findings showed: (1) children in racial/ethnic and socioeconomic minorities may have higher prevalence and greater risk for SDB, and (2) In the U.S., white children or children with private insurance are more likely to undergo adenotonsillectomy.Conclusions Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities are prevalent among children with SDB. Disparities in multiracial populations and disparities in access to care, treatment, and utilization of services for pediatric SDB require more detailed investigation. Given the potential negative impact of SDB in children, as well as its economic consequences, the evaluation of disparities should be prioritized in health policy research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.006

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boss, E. F., Smith, D. F., & Ishman, S. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Boss, Emily F.
Venue
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
299-307
ISSN
0165-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051883923
Cited by
159
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep-disordered breathing, pediatric sleep apnea, racial and ethnic disparities, socioeconomic disparities, adenotonsillectomy, health care access, health care utilization, Black children, insurance status, otolaryngology referral
MeSH terms
Adenoidectomy, Child, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Insurance, Health, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Social Class, Tonsillectomy, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review