The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
What's the difference? diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096 · Cited by 3,151
Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002 · Cited by 1,314
What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x · Cited by 1,276
Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research
Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/968464.968467 · Cited by 1,276
Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407918 · Cited by 1,125
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159571 · Cited by 889
Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036531 · Cited by 799
Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness
Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (2003) · Cited by 759
Shachaf, P. (2008) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003 · Cited by 499
Cited by
Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities
Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314559946 · Cited by 825
Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 · Cited by 633
Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters
Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0020 · Cited by 426
Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000113 · Cited by 375
Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 144-153
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990824574
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 26.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002
- The paper
- Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
