Cited by 104Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyQuality and Supply ManagementCorporate Governance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The outcome of company and account manager relationship quality on loyalty, relationship value and performance

Alejandro, Thomas Brashear, Souza, Daniela Vilaca, Boles, James S., Ribeiro, Áurea Helena Puga, Monteiro, Plinio Rafael Reis·2011·Industrial Marketing Management

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.008

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Achrol, 1983, The environment of marketing channel dyads: A framework for comparative analysis, Journal of Marketing, 47, 55, 10.2307/1251399 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 1990, A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships, Journal of Marketing, 54, 42, 10.2307/1252172 · DOI
  3. Anderson, 1992, The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels, Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 18, 10.2307/3172490 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barry, 2008, Empirical study of relationship value in industrial services, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23, 228, 10.1108/08858620810865807 · DOI
  5. Beatson, 2008, Employee behaviour and relationship quality: Impact on customers, Service Industries Journal, 28, 211, 10.1080/02642060701842282 · DOI
  6. Bello, 2004, An institutional analysis of supply chain innovations in global marketing channels, Industrial Marketing Management., 33, 57, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.011 · DOI
  7. Bensaou, 1999, Buyer–supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments?, Organization Science, 10, 460, 10.1287/orsc.10.4.460 · DOI
  8. Burton, 2003, Reality or perception?, Journal of Service Research, 5, 292, 10.1177/1094670503005004002 · DOI
  9. Cannon, 1999, Buyer–seller relationships in business markets, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 439, 10.2307/3151999 · DOI
  10. Chiou, 2006, Service quality, trust, specific asset investment, and expertise: Direct and indirect effects in a satisfaction-loyalty framework, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 613, 10.1177/0092070306286934 · DOI
  11. Crosby, 1990, Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective, Journal of Marketing, 54, 68, 10.2307/1251817 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Crosno, 2008, A meta-analytic review of opportunism in exchange relationships, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 191, 10.1007/s11747-007-0081-x · DOI
  13. De Wulf, 2001, Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration, Journal of Marketing, 65, 33, 10.1509/jmkg.65.4.33.18386 · DOI · Paper page
  14. De Wulf, 2003, Investments in consumer relationships: A critical reassessment and model extension, International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research, 13, 245, 10.1080/0959396032000101354 · DOI
  15. Dick, 1994, Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 99, 10.1177/0092070394222001 · DOI
  16. Doney, 1997, An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships, Journal of Marketing, 61, 35, 10.2307/1251829 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dwyer, 1987, Developing buyer–seller relationships, Journal of Marketing, 51, 11, 10.2307/1251126 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fang, 2008, Trust at different organizational levels, Journal of Marketing, 72, 80, 10.1509/jmkg.72.2.80 · DOI
  19. Fein, 1997, Patterns of credible commitments: Territory and brand selectivity in industrial channels, Journal of Marketing, 61, 19, 10.2307/1251828 · DOI
  20. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Fullerton, 2003, When does commitment lead to loyalty?, Journal of Service Research, 5, 333, 10.1177/1094670503005004005 · DOI
  22. Garbarino, 1999, The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships, Journal of Marketing, 63, 70, 10.2307/1251946 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Goff, 1997, The influence of salesperson selling behaviors on customer satisfaction with products, Journal of Retailing, 73, 171, 10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90002-6 · DOI
  24. Grewal, 2002, The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels, Journal of Marketing, 66, 82, 10.1509/jmkg.66.3.82.18504 · DOI
  25. Haenlein, 2004, A beginner's guide to partial least squares (PLS) analysis, Understanding Statistics, 3, 283, 10.1207/s15328031us0304_4 · DOI
  26. Hallén, 1991, Interfirm adaptation in business relationships, Journal of Marketing, 55, 29, 10.2307/1252235 · DOI
  27. Han, 1993, Buyer supplier relationships today, Industrial Marketing Management, 22, 331, 10.1016/0019-8501(93)90029-7 · DOI
  28. Hibbard, 2001, Examining the impact of destructive acts in marketing channel relationships, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 45, 10.1509/jmkr.38.1.45.18831 · DOI
  29. Huntley, 2006, Conceptualization and measurement of relationship quality: Linking relationship quality to actual sales and recommendation intention, Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 703, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.011 · DOI
  30. Hutt, 2000, Defining the social network of a strategic alliance, Sloan Management Review, 41, 51
  31. Iacobucci, 1996, Commercial and interpersonal relationships: Using the structure of interpersonal relationships to understand individual-to-individual, individual-to-firm, and firm-to-firm relationships in commerce, International Journal Of Research In Marketing, 13, 53, 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00034-8 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jap, 2001, Pie sharing in complex collaboration contexts, Journal Marketing Research, 38, 86, 10.1509/jmkr.38.1.86.18827 · DOI
  33. Kumar, 1995, The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer altitudes, Journal Of Marketing Research, 32, 348, 10.2307/3151986 · DOI
  34. Lohtia, 1994, The impact of transaction-specific investments on buyer–seller relationships, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 9, 6, 10.1108/08858629410053434 · DOI
  35. Luo, 2008, The moderating role of institutional networking in the customer orientation–trust/commitment–performance causal chain in China, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 202, 10.1007/s11747-007-0047-z · DOI
  36. Lusch, 1996, Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels, Journal of Marketing, 60, 19, 10.2307/1251899 · DOI
  37. Morgan, 1994, The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58, 20, 10.2307/1252308 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Palmatier, 2008, Interfirm relational drivers of customer value, Journal of Marketing, 72, 76, 10.1509/jmkg.72.4.76 · DOI
  39. Palmatier, 2006, Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis, Journal of Marketing, 70, 136, 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Palmatier, 2007, Use of relationship marketing programs in building customer–salesperson and customer–firm relationships: Differential influences on financial outcomes, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 210, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.12.006 · DOI
  41. Palmatier, 2007, A comparative longitudinal analysis of theoretical perspectives of interorganizational relationship performance, Journal of Marketing, 71, 172, 10.1509/jmkg.71.4.172 · DOI
  42. Patterson, 2003, A cross-cultural study of switching barriers and propensity to stay with service providers, Journal of Retailing, 79, 107, 10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00009-5 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Rauyruen, 2007, Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty, Journal of Business Research, 60, 21, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.11.006 · DOI
  44. Ribeiro, 2009, Marketing relationships in Brazil: Trends in value strategies and capabilities, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24, 449, 10.1108/08858620910966327 · DOI
  45. Ritter, 2007, A framework for analyzing relationship governance, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 22, 196, 10.1108/08858620710741904 · DOI
  46. Ryssel, 2004, The impact of information technology deployment on trust, commitment and value creation in business relationships, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19, 197, 10.1108/08858620410531333 · DOI
  47. Singh, 1995, Measurement issues in cross-national research, Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 597, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490188 · DOI
  48. Sirdeshmukh, 2002, Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges, Journal of Marketing, 66, 15, 10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Ulaga, 2006, Relationship value and relationship quality, European Journal of Marketing, 40, 311, 10.1108/03090560610648075 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Vandenbosch, 2002, Beyond better products: Capturing value in customer interactions, Sloan Management Review, 43, 35
  51. Walter, 2003, Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality, Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 159, 10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00230-4 · DOI
  52. Woo, 2004, Business-to-business relationship quality, European Journal of Marketing, 38, 1252, 10.1108/03090560410548960 · DOI
  53. Workman, 2003, Intraorganizational determinants of key account management effectiveness, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 31, 3, 10.1177/0092070302238599 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Alejandro, T. B., Souza, D. V., Boles, J. S., Ribeiro, Á. H. P., & Monteiro, P. R. R.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Fundação Dom Cabral (BR)
Venue
Industrial Marketing Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
0019-8501 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093221881
Cited by
104
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial Marketing Management (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
Keywords
relationship quality, account managers, customer loyalty, relationship value, firm performance, relationship-specific investment, consistency, mediating effect, automotive parts industry, B2B relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review