Cited by 493Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsSociology and Education Studies

A guide to abductive thematic analysis

Open access
Thompson, Jamie·2022·The Qualitative Report

Abstract

Thematic analysis is an increasingly popular method for analysing qualitative data within the social sciences. Current guides for conducting thematic analysis promote the method’s broad flexibility across research designs, which has resulted in criticism that the method lacks the rigour and structure necessary for credible academic research. Recognizing the challenges faced by qualitative scholars, I developed and present an 8-step prescriptive approach specific to abductive methodologies incorporating many concepts from seminal works in thematic analysis, and importantly maintaining the balance of theorising with empirical data, which is the core of abductive research.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper presents an 8-step prescriptive guide for conducting abductive thematic analysis, balancing empirical data with extant theory. It argues this structured approach addresses criticisms of thematic analysis as lacking rigour while remaining specific to abductive research designs.

Key findings

  • Proposes an 8-step process: transcription and familiarisation, coding, codebook, development of themes, theorising, comparison of datasets, data display, and writing up.
  • Abductive thematic analysis should produce latent themes, with theorising as a distinct step where existing theory guides but does not determine explanation; theory can be refined, changed, adapted, or consolidated when data do not fit.
  • Recommends at least 2–3 rounds of coding and a codebook with label, definition, “when to use”/“when not to use” criteria, and an example quotation; thematic network analysis can show how themes derive from codes.
  • Uses examples from the author’s research on ski resort employees and volunteer tourism, including consolidating “fun” and “exciting” codes into “enjoyable work” and combining Bourdieu’s practice theory with Blumer’s symbolic interactionism.

Methods

  • Conceptual/methodological paper, not an empirical study; develops an 8-step guide initially during the author’s PhD and refined through the author’s own research and teaching.
  • Integrates concepts from thematic analysis (e.g., codebook from Guest et al., 2012; thematic network analysis from Attride-Stirling, 2001) with seminal abductive research principles.
  • Illustrates steps with examples from the author’s prior studies, including ski resort employees and volunteer tourism projects.

Limitations

  • The paper states it is not a one-size-fits-all or flexible method for all thematic analysis; it is tailored specifically to abductive research methodologies.
  • The paper notes that advocates of reflexive/inductive thematic analysis have disregarded the codebook as positivistic, and that quantification of qualitative data is often impossible and unnecessary for exploratory conceptual understanding.
  • Evident from the text: the guide is based on the author’s experience and selected examples rather than systematic empirical validation or comparison with other abductive thematic analysis guides.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5340

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 17 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationcitation

    Quantification is not necessary for qualitative thematic analysis.

    “However, quantification is not necessary for qualitative thematic analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Presenting quotations improves trustworthiness of qualitative research.

    “Presenting quotations also improves trustworthiness, as the veracity of the raw empirical data is difficult to challenge, and is a method for demonstrating reflexivity by giving voice to the participants independent of your personal opinions or feelings (Guest et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guest et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Current guides for conducting thematic analysis promote the method's broad flexibility across research designs.

    “Current guides for conducting thematic analysis promote the method's broad flexibility across research designs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Guest et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nowell et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Braun & Clarke, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    The theoretical contributions of abductive research produce a degree of generalizability.

    “The theoretical contributions produce a degree of generalizability, as the theorisation of the raw data transcends the individualised social setting, as it has links to existing knowledge and understanding (Coffey & Atkinson, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Coffey & Atkinson, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    A thematic network analysis technique can address concerns about over-reaching and representativeness of theoretical contributions.

    “A thematic network analysis technique can address these concerns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: When abductively analysing data, often reviewers will question if an academic has over-reached and whether theoretical contributions are truly representative of the raw data.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • May combine two claims. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    This flexibility has resulted in criticism that thematic analysis lacks the rigour and structure necessary for credible academic research.

    “which has resulted in criticism that the method lacks the rigour and structure necessary for credible academic research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Braun et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Braun & Clarke, 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lochmiller, 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In abductive thematic analysis, latent themes should always be the outcome.

    “In the case of abductive thematic analysis, latent themes should always be the outcome as theorisation is central to abductive reasoning, as shall be discussed in the following step.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Thematic analysis is an increasingly popular method for analysing qualitative data within the social sciences.

    “Thematic analysis is an increasingly popular method for analysing qualitative data within the social sciences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Braun et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Campbell et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Step 5 (Theorising) is an important part of abductive thematic analysis, making it distinct from other guides to qualitative analysis.

    “This is an important part of abductive thematic analysis, making it distinct from other guides to qualitative analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The consolidation of an abductive research design with thematic analysis is an effective tool for gathering rich understanding from participant narratives, while ensuring findings have theoretical generalizability.

    “Overall, the consolidation of an abductive research design with thematic analysis is an effective tool for gathering rich understanding from participant narratives, while ensuring findings have theoretical generalizability (Coffey & Atkinson, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Coffey & Atkinson, 1996

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    There is no requirement for data display to be quantified.

    “However, like with Step 6, there is no requirement for data display to be quantified.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    The core of abductive research is maintaining the balance of theorising with empirical data.

    “maintaining the balance of theorising with empirical data, which is the core of abductive research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Atkinson et al., 2003

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hurley et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kelle, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Braun et al. (2019) point to similarities between their approach to thematic analysis with grounded theory, interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA), and the active role of the researcher in generating themes.

    “Braun et al. (2019) specifically point to the similarities between their approach to thematic analysis with grounded theory, interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA), and the active role of the researcher in generating themes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braun et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This method can act as a point of departure for any exploratory qualitative data analysis, when a researcher wishes to incorporate theoretical frameworks to guide the research findings.

    “This method can act as a point of departure for any exploratory qualitative data analysis, when a researcher wishes to incorporate theoretical frameworks to guide the research findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Many researchers cite Braun and Clarke (2006) without mentioning researcher reflexivity central to their style of analysis.

    “Many researchers also cite Braun and Clarke (2006), yet within their methodology, there is no mention of researcher reflexivity central to their style of analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braun and Clarke, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

10 of 10
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Guides for abductive research designs are lacking.

    “Yet, guides for abductive research designs are lacking.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is limited discussion of an abductive approach to thematic analysis in the qualitative research literature.

    “Yet, there is limited discussion of an abductive approach to thematic analysis in the qualitative research literature.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Coding is a cyclical act, as the first round of coding rarely succeeds in identifying all codes.

    “Coding is a cyclical act, as the first round of coding rarely succeeds in identifying all codes and, therefore, it is recommended to undertake at least 2-3 rounds of coding.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When abductively analysing data, often reviewers will question if an academic has over-reached and whether theoretical contributions are truly representative of the raw data.

    “When abductively analysing data, often reviewers will question if an academic has over-reached and whether theoretical contributions are truly representative of the raw data.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Even within top-ranked journals, data displays are often constructed simply using shape and arrow tools available within MS Word.

    “However, even within top-ranked journals, data displays (such as that shown in Figure 3) are often constructed simply using shape and arrow tools available within MS Word”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The placement students' reflections were focused on their collaborative experiences, and were analysed by academic researchers using an abductive approach, to construct themes grounded in the data (inductive coding) but also informed by existing literature on SaP (deductive coding).

    “The placement students' reflections were focused on their collaborative experiences, and were analysed by academic researchers using an abductive approach (Thompson, 2022), to construct themes that are grounded in the data (inductive coding) but also informed by existing literature on SaP (deductive coding).”

    From Co-creating custom GPTs: an autoethnographic study of undergraduate students as partners in generative AI innovation (2026) · cites this paper as Thompson, 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In I. Szeman & T. Kaposy (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthropology (pp. 81-93).
  2. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organisational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.
  3. Jonsen, K., Fendt, J., & Point, S. (2017). Convincing qualitative research: What constitutes persuasive writing? Organizational Research Methods, 21(1), 30-67.
  4. Morse, J. M. (1994). "Emerging from the data": The cognitive processes of analysis in qualitative inquiry. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 23-43). SAGE.
  5. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13.
  6. Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3 rd ed.). SAGE.
  7. Seidel, J., & Kelle, U. (1995). Different functions of coding in the analysis of textual data. In U. Kelle (Ed.), Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods and practice (pp. 52-61). SAGE.
  8. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, J.
Affiliations
Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Jamie
Venue
The Qualitative Report
Published
2022-05-20
ISSN
  • 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3715
OpenAlex
W4280585239
Cited by
493
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 131 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 6
FWCI
195.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
Keywords
abductive research, thematic analysis, qualitative data analysis, scientific rigor, research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review