Cited by 100Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesEducational Outcomes and Influences

A negative Flynn effect in Finland, 1997–2009

Dutton, Edward, Lynn, Richard·2013·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2013.05.008

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutton, E., & Lynn, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Dutton, Edward
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
817-820
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077480215
Cited by
100
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-05-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
Flynn effect, IQ trends, conscripts, intelligence test scores, cognitive decline, Finland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review