Cited by 285Cognitive Abilities and TestingEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Age versus Schooling Effects on Intelligence Development

Cahan, Sorel, Cohen, Nora·1989·Child Development

Abstract

The effect of formal education, as opposed to chronological age, on intelligence development has suffered from inadequate empirical investigation. Most studies of this issue have relied on natural variation in exposure to school among children of the same age, thus confounding differences in schooling with differences in other intelligence-related variables. This difficulty can be overcome by a quasi-experimental paradigm involving comparison between children who differ in both chronological age and schooling. The present study applies this paradigm to the estimation of the independent effects of age and schooling in grades 5 and 6 on raw scores obtained on a variety of general ability tests. The sample included all students in Jerusalem's Hebrew-language, state-controlled elementary schools. The results unambiguously point to schooling as the major factor underlying the increase of intelligence test scores as a function of age and to the larger effect schooling has on verbal than nonverbal tests. These results contribute to our understanding of the causal model underlying intelligence development and call for reconsideration of the conceptual basis underlying the definition of deviation-IQ scores. Some implications of these results concerning the distinction between intelligence and scholastic achievement, the causal model underlying the development of "crystallized" and "fluid" abilities, and the notion of "culture-fair" tests are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1130797

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schooling increases intelligence test scores independently of age.

    “Cahan and Cohen [1989] use a quasi-experimental paradigm comparing children who differ in both age and schooling to show that schooling increases intelligence test scores independently of age.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Cahan and Cohen [1989]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cahan, S., & Cohen, N.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1989-10
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
1239
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025996934
Cited by
285
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
intelligence development, schooling effects, chronological age, formal education, general ability test, verbal intelligence, nonverbal intelligence, crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence, academic performance, elementary school students
MeSH terms
Achievement, Age Factors, Child, Child Development, Education, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review