Cited by 26Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Negative effects associated with internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy: An analysis of client emails

Open access
Gullickson, Kirsten M., Hadjistavropoulos, Heather D., Dear, Blake F., Titov, Nickolai·2019·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) is an efficacious form of treatment for anxiety and depression, yet it is still possible for clients to experience negative effects associated with treatment. In the ICBT literature, the term negative effects is broadly used to refer to all potentially adverse or unwanted events or experiences that are perceived as undesirable by the client and may or may not be associated with long-term symptoms or distress. Previous ICBT studies have asked clients to retrospectively describe negative effects at post-treatment; however, no research has examined the content of clients' emails to their therapist to see whether clients are reporting negative effects as they arise. In the current study, 96 clients (80 completers; 16 non-completers) were randomly selected from a published ICBT trial and directed content analysis was used to examine client emails for mention of negative effects. In addition, correlational analyses were used to examine the relationship between negative effects and: 1) demographic characteristics; 2) treatment engagement; 3) treatment satisfaction; 4) working alliance; and 5) symptom outcomes among completers. The results indicated that 61.5% of clients experienced at least one negative effect during treatment, although total number of negative effects was not significantly correlated with client demographic characteristics, lessons completed, working alliance, treatment satisfaction, or symptom outcomes. Among completers, technical difficulties, implementation problems, and negative emotional states were the most commonly reported negative effects, whereas dropout was the most commonly reported negative effect by non-completers. Negative effects that have been identified in previous research, such as symptom deterioration, novel symptoms, and severe adverse events, were not identified in client emails. The high incidence of negative effects in the current study suggests there may be value in systematically monitoring client emails for negative effects throughout treatment as a supplement to retrospective post-treatment reports. This will give therapists the opportunity to intervene as negative effects occur and potentially mitigate any impact they have on treatment outcomes. Future research, both qualitative and quantitative, is needed to gain a more nuanced understanding of negative effects associated with ICBT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100278

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serious adverse events are unlikely with exercise and CBT.

    “Serious adverse events are unlikely with exercise 45 and CBT 46”

    From Management of chronic pain associated with temporomandibular disorders: a clinical practice guideline (2023) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Discussion reports that clients did not mention severe adverse events, such as suicidality or hospitalization, in emails to their therapists. That supports an absence of reported events in this internet-delivered CBT sample, but it does not establish that serious adverse events are generally unlikely with CBT. The exercise portion is attached to a different citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Andersson G. Titov N. Advantages and limitations of internet-based interventions for common mental disorders World Psychiatry 13 2014 4 11 24497236 PMC3918007
  2. Andersson G. Titov N. Dear B.F. Rozental A. Carlbring P. Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation World Psychiatry 18 2019 20 28 30600624 PMC6313242
  3. Eubanks C.F. Burckell L.A. Goldfried M.R. Clinical consensus strategies to repair ruptures in the therapeutic alliance J. Psychother. Integr. 28 1 2018 60 76 29805243 PMC5966286
  4. Hsieh H.-F. Shannon S.E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis Qual. Health Res. 15 9 2005 1277 1288 16204405
  5. Parry G.D. Crawford M.J. Duggan C. Iatrogenic harm from psychological therapist - time to move on Br. J. Psychiatry 208 2016 210 212 26932481
  6. Scott J. Young A.H. Psychotherapies should be assessed for both benefit and harm Br. J. Psychiatry 208 208–209 2016 26932480
  7. Spitzer R.L. Kroenke K. Williams J.B.W. Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder Arch. Intern. Med. 166 2006 1092 1097 16717171

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gullickson, K. M., Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Dear, B. F., & Titov, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hadjistavropoulos, Heather D.
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
18
Pages
100278
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971381309
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, adverse outcomes, adverse events, patient-therapist communication, treatment discontinuation, technical challenges, treatment engagement, treatment satisfaction, therapeutic relationship, symptom deterioration, online therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review