Cited by 154Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Does Internet-based guided-self-help for depression cause harm? An individual participant data meta-analysis on deterioration rates and its moderators in randomized controlled trials

Open access
Ebert, D. D., Donkin, L., Andersson, G., Andrews, G., Berger, T., Carlbring, P., Rozenthal, A., Choi, I. +21 more·2016·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Almost nothing is known about the potential negative effects of Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. This study aims at investigating deterioration and its moderators within randomized trials on Internet-based guided self-help for adult depression, using an individual patient data meta-analyses (IPDMA) approach. Method: Studies were identified through systematic searches (PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library). Deterioration in participants was defined as a significant symptom increase according to the reliable change index (i.e. 7.68 points in the CES-D; 7.63 points in the BDI). Two-step IPDMA procedures, with a random-effects model were used to pool data. Results: A total of 18 studies (21 comparisons, 2079 participants) contributed data to the analysis. The risk for a reliable deterioration from baseline to post-treatment was significantly lower in the intervention v . control conditions (3.36 v . 7.60; relative risk 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.29–0.75). Education moderated effects on deterioration, with patients with low education displaying a higher risk for deterioration than patients with higher education. Deterioration rates for patients with low education did not differ statistically significantly between intervention and control groups. The benefit–risk ratio for patients with low education indicated that 9.38 patients achieve a treatment response for each patient experiencing a symptom deterioration. Conclusions: Internet-based guided self-help is associated with a mean reduced risk for a symptom deterioration compared to controls. Treatment and symptom progress of patients with low education should be closely monitored, as some patients might face an increased risk for symptom deterioration. Future studies should examine predictors of deterioration in patients with low education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291716001562

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a patient-level analysis on guided ICBT (18 studies, 2,079 participants), the deterioration rate was 3.36% in treatment groups and 7.60% in control groups (RR=0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.75).

    “In a similar patientlevel analysis on guided ICBT 81 (18 stud ies, 2,079 participants), the deterioration rate was 3.36% in the treatment groups and 7.60% in the control groups (relative risk=0.47,95% CI: 0.29 to 0.75).”
  • Patients with lower education presented a higher risk for deterioration than those with higher education in guided ICBT.

    “Patients with lower education presented a higher risk for deterioration than those with higher education.”
  • The proportion of individuals experiencing symptom deterioration during face-to-face psychological interventions is estimated to range between 3-14%, comparable to deterioration rates for online interventions.

    “Although deterioration rates are infrequently reported in the literature, the proportion of individuals experiencing symptom deterioration during face-to-face psychological interventions is estimated to range between 3-14% (Ebert et al., 2016; Cujipers et al., 2018; Ronk et al., 2013), which is comparable to deterioration rates for online interventions (Ebert et al., 2016).”
  • A potential negative effect of self-help treatments is delayed help-seeking, which could result in further deterioration of symptoms if the initial self-help treatment is not sufficient.

    “However, the potential negative effect could be that self-help treatments could lead to a delayed help-seeking, which could result in further deterioration of symptoms, if the initial self-help treatment should be not sufficient.23”
  • Previous research suggests that synchronous support, such as weekly check-ins with a therapist or group support sessions, is beneficial for engaging individuals in self-guided interventions.

    “This is in line with previous research that suggests the use of synchronous support, such as weekly check-ins with a therapist or group support sessions as being beneficial for engaging individuals in self-guided in­ terventions (Baumeister, Reichler, Munzinger, & Lin 2014; Ebert et al., 2016).”

    From An ACT self-help intervention for adults with a visible difference in appearance: A pilot feasibility and acceptability randomized controlled study. (2023) · cites this paper as Ebert et al., 2016

    The Methods (Identification and selection of studies; page unavailable) say the analysis included therapist-guided self-help and excluded group-format interventions. The Discussion addresses symptom deterioration, not whether synchronous support, weekly check-ins, or group sessions improve engagement. Searches for those forms of support and for engagement or adherence found no passage establishing the attributed benefit. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Higgins JPT Altman DG Sterne JAC 2011 Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011) updated March 2011 Higgins JPT Green S The Cochrane Collaboration 2011 (www.cochrane-handbook.org) The Atrium Southern Gate, Chichester

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebert, D. D., Donkin, L., Andersson, G., Andrews, G., Berger, T., Carlbring, P., Rozenthal, A., Choi, I., Laferton, J. A. C., Johansson, R., Kleiboer, A., Lange, A., Lehr, D., Reins, J. A., Funk, B., Newby, J., Perini, S., Riper, H., Ruwaard, J., Sheeber, L., Snoek, F. J., Titov, N., Ünlü Ince, B., van Bastelaar, K., Vernmark, K., van Straten, A., Warmerdam, L., Salsman, N., & Cuijpers, P.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Psychologische Hochschule Berlin (DE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Xavier University (US)
Corresponding author
Ebert, D. D.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2016-09-20
Volume
46
Issue
13
Pages
2679-2693
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2522560600
Cited by
154
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (2007DE161PR001, 603098, CCI 2007DE161PR001)
  • European Regional Development Fund (CCI 2007DE161PR001, 2007DE161PR001)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD081362)
  • H2020 European Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, symptom deterioration, educational attainment, treatment moderators, risk-benefit ratio, reliable change index, treatment response
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Self Care, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review