Cited by 23Evolution and Genetic DynamicsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Adaptive evolution of a minimal organism with a synthetic genome

Open access

Abstract

The bacterial strain JCVI-syn3.0 stands as the first example of a living organism with a minimized synthetic genome, derived from the Mycoplasma mycoides genome and chemically synthesized in vitro. Here we report the experimental evolution of a syn3.0-derived strain. Ten independent replicates were evolved for several hundred generations, leading to growth rate improvements of >15%. Endpoint strains possessed an average of 8 mutations composed of indels and SNPs, with a pronounced C/G->A/T transversion bias. Multiple genes were repeated mutational targets across the independent lineages, including phase variable lipoprotein activation, 5 distinct nonsynonymous substitutions in the same membrane transporter protein, and inactivation of an uncharacterized gene. Transcriptomic analysis revealed an overall tradeoff reflected in upregulated ribosomal proteins and downregulated DNA and RNA related proteins during adaptation. This work establishes the suitability of synthetic, minimal strains for laboratory evolution, providing a means to optimize strain growth characteristics and elucidate gene functionality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107500

Cites

27 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of DNA sequencing coverage data from a recent evolution study found ori:ter values ranging from 1.0 to 1.2.

    “As additional validation for the ori:ter ratio of 1.21, we analyzed DNA sequencing coverage data from a recent study that tracked the evolution of Syn3A over 400 generations and found values ranging from 1.0 to 1.2.20”
  • A similar observation was made in the evolutionary study, where mutations frequently arose in tetM.

    “A similar observation was made in the evolutionary study mentioned above, where mutations frequently arose in tetM.20”
  • Many genes are transcribed cooperatively into polycistronic RNA.

    “It is known that many genes are transcribed cooperatively into polycistronic RNA,20”

    From Bringing the genetically minimal cell to life on a computer in 4D (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results discuss RNA-seq expression patterns, and the Transcriptomics methods describe RNA sequencing, but neither addresses whether multiple genes are transcribed into polycistronic RNA. Searches for polycistronic transcripts and operons found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For 10 evolutionary endpoints, the ori:ter ratios were 1.06, 1.10, 1.05, 1.13, 1.12, 1.07, 1.02, 1.12, 1.19, and 1.16.

    “The ratios were 1.06 (endpoint a1: 365/345), 1.10 (endpoint a2: 217/197), 1.05 (endpoint a3: 281/267), 1.13 (endpoint a4: 268/237), 1.12 (endpoint a5: 200/178), 1.07 (endpoint a6: 158/148), 1.02 (endpoint a7: 246/242), 1.12 (endpoint a8: 195/174), 1.19 (endpoint a9: 238/200), and 1.16 (endpoint a10: 243/210).”

    From Bringing the genetically minimal cell to life on a computer in 4D (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results describe ten evolved lineages and endpoint clones, but do not report ori:ter ratios for them. Searches of our copy for the ratio values, the listed numerators and denominators, and origin-to-terminus replication coverage found no passage supporting those measurements. The Methods discuss genome sequencing without giving the claimed ratios. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sandberg, T. E., Wise, K. S., Dalldorf, C., Szubin, R., Feist, A. M., Glass, J. I., & Palsson, B. O.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
107500
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385323819
Cited by
23
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Science Foundation (MCB 2221237, MCB 1840301, MCB 1840320, MCB 1818344)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
experimental evolution, adaptive evolution, Mycoplasma mycoides, growth rate optimization, membrane transporters, gene function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review