Cited by 36SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Safety and immunogenicity of VLPCOV-02, a SARS-CoV-2 self-amplifying RNA vaccine with a modified base, 5-methylcytosine

Open access
Aboshi, Masayuki, Matsuda, Kenta, Kawakami, Daisuke, Kono, Kaoru, Kazami, Yoko, Sekida, Takashi, Komori, Mai, Morey, Amber L. +7 more·2024·iScience

Abstract

Continuing emergence of variants of concern resulting in reduced SARS-CoV-2 vaccine efficacy necessitates additional prevention strategies. The structure of VLPCOV-01, a lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated, self-amplifying RNA COVID-19 vaccine with a comparable immune response to BNT162b2, was revised by incorporating a modified base, 5-methylcytosine, to reduce reactogenicity, and an updated receptor-binding domain derived from the Brazil (gamma) variant. Interim analyses of a phase 1 dose-escalation booster vaccination study with the resulting construct, VLPCOV-02, in healthy, previously vaccinated Japanese individuals (N = 96) are reported (jRCT2051230005). A dose-related increase in solicited local and systemic adverse events was observed, which were generally rated mild or moderate. The most commonly occurring events were tenderness, pain, fatigue, and myalgia. Serum SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin titers increased during the 4 weeks post-immunization. VLPCOV-02 demonstrated a favorable safety profile compared with VLPCOV-01, with reduced adverse events and fewer fever events at an equivalent dose. These findings support further study of VLPCOV-02.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108964

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, a study reported that 5% m5C-modified saRNA affords a functional construct as a SARS-CoV-2 booster in a phase 1 human safety study.

    “Recently, a study reported that 5% m5C-modified saRNA affords a functional construct as a SARS-CoV-2 booster in a phase 1 human safety study47.”

    From Complete substitution with modified nucleotides in self-amplifying RNA suppresses the interferon response and increases potency (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Introduction identifies VLPCOV-02 as a 5-methylcytosine–modified saRNA booster, and the Methods describe the reported phase 1 human safety study. The Conclusions report improved immune responses and a favorable safety profile, supporting the description of a functional construct. Our copy does not establish the claimed 5% modification level (searched: “5%” and “5% 5-methylcytosine modified saRNA”). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Healthy participants vaccinated with LNPs containing 1, 3, 7.5, or 15 μg of 5% m5C saRNA had ~3-fold higher IgG titers at day 28.

    “Healthy participants vaccinated with LNPs containing 1, 3, 7.5, or 15 μg of 5% m5C saRNA had ~3-fold higher IgG titers at day 28.”

    From Complete substitution with modified nucleotides in self-amplifying RNA suppresses the interferon response and increases potency (2025) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results (Immunogenicity; page unavailable) report that IgG geometric mean titers rose from day 0 to day 28 at each dose, but the increases ranged from 2.3–5.1-fold in non-elderly participants and 2.3–2.9-fold in elderly participants, rather than being approximately threefold throughout. The Introduction and Discussion (Conclusions; pages unavailable) identify VLPCOV-02 as a 5-methylcytosine–modified, LNP-encapsulated saRNA vaccine, but the passages found do not establish the claimed 5% modification level. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aboshi, M., Matsuda, K., Kawakami, D., Kono, K., Kazami, Y., Sekida, T., Komori, M., Morey, A. L., Suga, S., Smith, J. F., Fukuhara, T., Iwatani, Y., Yamamoto, T., Sato, N., & Akahata, W.
Affiliations
  • VLP Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • National Hospital Organization (JP)
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition (JP)
Corresponding author
Akahata, Wataru
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
108964
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391113138
Cited by
36
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP21nf0101627)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
self-amplifying RNA vaccine, SARS-CoV-2, 5-methylcytosine, modified nucleosides, lipid nanoparticle vaccine, COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, dose escalation, booster vaccination, receptor binding domain, reactogenicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review