Cited by 173SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Safety and immunogenicity of a self-amplifying RNA vaccine against COVID-19: COVAC1, a phase I, dose-ranging trial

Open access
Pollock, Katrina M., Cheeseman, Hannah M., Szubert, Alexander J., Libri, Vincenzo, Boffito, Marta, Owen, David, Bern, Henry, McFarlane, Leon R. +72 more·2022·eClinicalMedicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encapsulated self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) is a novel technology formulated as a low dose vaccine against COVID-19. METHODS: October 2020. Participants received two intramuscular (IM) injections of LNP-nCoVsaRNA at six different dose levels, 0.1-10.0μg, given four weeks apart. An open-label dose escalation was followed by a dose evaluation. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for one week from enrolment, with follow-up at regular intervals (1-8 weeks). The binding and neutralisation capacity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody raised in participant sera was measured by means of an anti-Spike (S) IgG ELISA, immunoblot, SARS-CoV-2 pseudoneutralisation and wild type neutralisation assays. (The trial is registered: ISRCTN17072692, EudraCT 2020-001646-20). FINDINGS: 192 healthy individuals with no history or serological evidence of COVID-19, aged 18-45 years were enrolled. The vaccine was well tolerated with no serious adverse events related to vaccination. Seroconversion at week six whether measured by ELISA or immunoblot was related to dose (both p<0.001), ranging from 8% (3/39; 0.1μg) to 61% (14/23; 10.0μg) in ELISA and 46% (18/39; 0.3μg) to 87% (20/23; 5.0μg and 10.0μg) in a post-hoc immunoblot assay. Geometric mean (GM) anti-S IgG concentrations ranged from 74 (95% CI, 45-119) at 0.1μg to 1023 (468-2236) ng/mL at 5.0μg (p<0.001) and was not higher at 10.0μg. Neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 by participant sera was measurable in 15% (6/39; 0.1μg) to 48% (11/23; 5.0μg) depending on dose level received. INTERPRETATION: Encapsulated saRNA is safe for clinical development, is immunogenic at low dose levels but failed to induce 100% seroconversion. Modifications to optimise humoral responses are required to realise its potential as an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. FUNDING: This study was co-funded by grants and gifts from the Medical Research Council UKRI (MC_PC_19076), and the National Institute Health Research/Vaccine Task Force, Partners of Citadel and Citadel Securities, Sir Joseph Hotung Charitable Settlement, Jon Moulton Charity Trust, Pierre Andurand, Restore the Earth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101262

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current understanding of the field is that incorporating modified NTPs into saRNA abrogates downstream efficacy.

    “However, the current understanding of the field is that incorporating modified NTPs into saRNA abrogates downstream efficacy, as reported by multiple independent groups5,19–28.”

    From Complete substitution with modified nucleotides in self-amplifying RNA suppresses the interferon response and increases potency (2025) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that the compatibility of modified bases with saRNA has not been established and that the bases would be rapidly lost during amplification. This supports a concern about their usefulness, but it does not establish that incorporating modified NTPs abrogates downstream efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two different saRNA vaccines developed independently by Arcturus Therapeutics and Imperial College London have shown favorable immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, and have entered clinical trials.

    “Recently, two different saRNA vaccines developed independently by Arcturus Therapeutics and Imperial College London have shown favorable immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, and have entered clinical trials.211–213”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [212]

  • Compared with the dose of mRNA in the Moderna vaccine (100 μg) and that of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (30 μg), the amount of saRNA required for vaccine development is within a range of 0.1~10 μg.

    “Compared with the dose of mRNA in the Moderna vaccine (100 μg) and that of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (30 μg), the amount of saRNA required for vaccine development is within a range of 0.1~10 μg.212”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [212]

  • LNP-nCoVsaRNA showed seroconversion rate from 8% to 61% by ELISA when 0.1-10.0 μg was administered per dose group, and demonstrated inferior immunogenicity in humans compared to mice.

    “the saRNA vaccine LNP-nCoVsaRNA developed by the Imperial College London showed seroconversion rate from 8% to 61% as determined by ELISA when 0.1–10.0 μg was administered per dose group, demonstrated inferior immunogenicity in humans compared to that observed in mice.212”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [212]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [18]Kremsner P Mann P Bosch J Phase 1 Assessment of the Safety and Immunogenicity of an mRNA- Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Candidate Against SARS-CoV-2 in Human Volunteers medRxiv 2020 10.1101/2020.11.09.20228551 PMC8354521 34378087 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [22]Baden LR El Sahly HM Essink B Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine N Engl J Med 384 2021 403 416 33378609 PMC7787219
  3. [26]Polack FP Thomas SJ Kitchin N Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine N Engl J Med 383 2020 2603 2615 33301246 PMC7745181

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollock, K. M., Cheeseman, H. M., Szubert, A. J., Libri, V., Boffito, M., Owen, D., Bern, H., McFarlane, L. R., O'Hara, J., Lemm, N.-M., McKay, P., Rampling, T., Yim, Y. T. N., Milinkovic, A., Kingsley, C., Cole, T., Fagerbrink, S., Aban, M., Tanaka, M., Mehdipour, S., Robbins, A., Budd, W., Faust, S., Hassanin, H., Cosgrove, C. A., Winston, A., Fidler, S., Dunn, D., McCormack, S., Shattock, R. J., Adams, K., Amini, F., Atako, N. B., Bakri, A., Barclay, W., Brodnicki, E., Brown, J. C., Byrne, R., Chilvers, R., Coelho, S., Day, S., Desai, M., Dorman, E., Elliott, T., Flight, K. E., Fletcher, J., Galang, J., Gohil, J., Gupta, A., Harlow, C., Hu, K., Kalyan, M., Lagrue, D., Liscano, E., Njenga, C., Polra, K., Powlette, D. A., Randell, P., Rauchenberger, M., Redknap, I., Ricamara, M., Rogers, P., Sallah, H., Samnuan, K., Schumacher, M., Shah, Z., Shaw, R., Shaw, T., Sivapatham, S., Slater, S., Sorley, K., Storch, R., Tan, E., Tan, T., Thielemans, L., Whitely, S., Valentine, C., Varghese, J., Vikraman, A., & Wilkins, M.
Affiliations
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
  • UCL Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Shattock, Robin J.
Venue
eClinicalMedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
44
Pages
101262
ISSN
2589-5370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220898781
Cited by
173
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 2
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EClinicalMedicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_19076, MC_UU_12023/23, MC_UU_00004/04)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R013764/1)
  • James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
self-amplifying RNA vaccine, COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2, lipid nanoparticles, dose escalation, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, anti-spike IgG, neutralizing antibodies, seroconversion, dose-response relationship, intramuscular injection, healthy volunteers, vaccine adjuvants, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review