Cited by 138Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abnormal Amygdala Functional Connectivity Associated With Emotional Lability in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Open access
Hulvershorn, Leslie A., Mennes, Maarten, Castellanos, F. Xavier, Di Martino, Adriana, Milham, Michael P., Hummer, Tom A., Roy, Amy Krain·2014·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective A substantial proportion of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) also display emotion regulation deficits manifesting as chronic irritability, severe temper outbursts, and aggression. The amygdala is implicated in emotion regulation, but its connectivity and relation to emotion regulation in ADHD has yet to be explored. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) of amygdala circuits and emotion regulation deficits in youth with ADHD. Method Bilateral amygdala iFC was examined using functional magnetic resonance imaging in 63 children with ADHD, aged 6 to 13 years. First, we examined the relationship between amygdala IFC and parent ratings of emotional lability (EL) in children with ADHD. Second, we compared amygdala iFC across subgroups of children with ADHD and high EL (n = 18), ADHD and low EL (n = 20), and typically developing children (TDC), all with low EL (n = 19). Results Higher EL ratings were associated with greater positive iFC between the amygdala and rostral anterior cingulate cortex in youth with ADHD. EL scores were also negatively associated with iFC between bilateral amygdala and posterior insula/superior temporal gyrus. Patterns of amygdala-cortical iFC in ADHD participants with low EL were not different from the comparison group, and the effect sizes for these comparisons were smaller than those for the trend-level differences observed between the high-EL and TDC groups. Conclusions In children with ADHD and a range of EL, deficits in emotion regulation were associated with altered amygdala-cortical iFC. When comparing groups that differed on ADHD status but not EL, differences in amygdala iFC were small and nonsignificant, highlighting the specificity of this finding to emotional deficits, independent of other ADHD symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.11.012

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Arnsten, 2009, The emerging neurobiology of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: the key role of the prefrontal association cortex, J Pediatr, 154

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–138 of 138

Metadata

Authors
Hulvershorn, L. A., Mennes, M., Castellanos, F. X., Di Martino, A., Milham, M. P., Hummer, T. A., & Roy, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Riley Hospital for Children (US)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
Corresponding author
Hulvershorn, Leslie A.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
351-361.e1
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127237900
Cited by
138
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH087770, K23MH074821, R01MH081218)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K12DA000357)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD065282)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, emotional lability, amygdala, intrinsic functional connectivity, emotion regulation, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, posterior insula, superior temporal gyrus, children, irritability, temper outbursts
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Amygdala, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review