Cited by 33Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Addressing challenging behaviors in challenging environments: Findings from Ohio's early childhood mental health consultation system

Reyes, Chin R., Gilliam, Walter S.·2021·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

Early childhood mental health consultation (ECMHC) has been promoted by the federal government as a promising model for reducing early childhood expulsions and suspensions and is now implemented by numerous states. Despite growing ECMHC proliferation, this study is only the second randomized controlled trial of ECMHC, extending the methodologies of the first to include assessment of effects on random peers. Classrooms were assigned randomly to treatment or waitlist-control condition (n= 51 classrooms, 57 preschool teachers, and 190 preschoolers). Evaluation measures were collected at both pretreatment and posttreatment, following approximately six consultation visits. Classroom and teacher outcomes were evaluated with ordinary least squares regressions, while hierarchical linear modeling was used to evaluate child-level outcomes, accounting for the nested study design. Treatment children (both the target children who prompted the referral for ECMHC and random peers) evidenced significant improvements in social and emotional skills. Promising trend findings were noted for child behavior problem reduction and teacher pedagogical approach and locus of control. No significant effects were found on likelihood of expulsion and classroom mental health climate. This is the first ECMHC to demonstrate effects on nontarget peers in a rigorous randomized controlled trial. Programmatic and methodologic limitations and implications are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579420001790

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reyes, C. R., & Gilliam, W. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Reyes, Chin R.
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
634-646
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W3137566797
Cited by
33
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
9.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
behavioral problems, preschool children, socioemotional skills, child behavior problems, teacher pedagogical approaches, locus of control, early childhood education
MeSH terms
School Teachers, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Humans, Mental Health, Ohio, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review