Cited by 76Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Adolescents’ prescription stimulant use and adult functional outcomes: a national prospective study

Open access
McCabe, Sean Esteban, Veliz, Philip, Wilens, Timothy E., Schulenberg, John E.·2017·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To assess the prospective 17-year relationship between the medical and nonmedical use of prescription stimulants during adolescence (age 18 years) and educational attainment and substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms in adulthood (age 35 years).Method A survey was self-administered by nationally representative probability samples of US high school seniors from the Monitoring the Future study; 8,362 of these individuals were followed longitudinally from adolescence (age 18, high school senior years 1976-1996) to adulthood (age 35, 1993-2013).Results An estimated 8.1% reported medical use of prescription stimulants, and 16.7% reported nonmedical use of prescription stimulants by age 18 years. Approximately 43% of adolescent medical users of prescription stimulants had also engaged in nonmedical use of prescription stimulants during adolescence. Among past-year adolescent nonmedical users of prescription stimulants, 97.3% had used at least one other substance during the past year. Medical users of prescription stimulants without any history of nonmedical use during adolescence did not differ significantly from population controls (i.e., non-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD] and non-stimulant-medicated ADHD during adolescence) in educational attainment and SUD symptoms in adulthood. In contrast, adolescent nonmedical users of prescription stimulants (with or without medical use) had lower educational attainment and more SUD symptoms in adulthood, compared to population controls and medical users of prescription stimulants without nonmedical use during adolescence.Conclusion Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants is common among adolescents prescribed these medications. The findings indicate youth should be carefully monitored for nonmedical use because this behavior is associated with lower educational attainment and more SUD symptoms in adulthood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.12.008

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a US prospective study, non-medical prescription stimulant users were 17% less likely to earn a bachelor's degree than those with neither medical nor non-medical use.

    “Those who used prescription stimulants non-medically were 17% less likely to earn a bachelor’s degree than those who had neither medical or non-medical use (McCabe et al., 2017).”

    From The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder (2021) · cites this paper as McCabe et al., 2017

    The Methods (Measures; page unavailable) define population controls as adolescents with neither medical nor nonmedical stimulant use. The Results (Predicting adult educational attainment; page unavailable) report significantly lower odds of earning a bachelor’s degree by age 35 among adolescent nonmedical users than among those controls, but the passages in our copy do not give the claimed 17% figure. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Non-medical use of prescription stimulants in individuals without ADHD is associated with lower educational attainment.

    “The non-medical use of prescribed stimulants in individuals without ADHD is associated with lower educational attainment.”

    From The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder (2021) · cites this paper as McCabe et al., 2017

    The Results section ('Predicting adult educational attainment'; page unavailable) reports that adolescents who used prescription stimulants nonmedically had lower odds of obtaining a college degree by age 35. It does not report this association specifically for individuals without ADHD; the nonmedical-use groups include people with and without a history of medical stimulant use. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ADHD is itself an important risk factor for illicit stimulant misuse and SUD.

    “While multiple studies have shown that ADHD is itself an important risk factor for illicit stimulant misuse and SUD, 5,12,15,[20][21][22][23][24]”

    From Is Age of Onset and Duration of Stimulant Therapy for ADHD Associated with Cocaine, Methamphetamine, and Prescription Stimulant Misuse? (2024) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Discussion states that ADHD is associated with higher rates of SUD. It also reports nonmedical stimulant use among adolescents prescribed stimulants, but does not establish that ADHD itself is a risk factor for illicit stimulant misuse; its discussion identifies other possible risk factors. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCabe, S. E., Veliz, P., Wilens, T. E., & Schulenberg, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
McCabe, Sean Esteban
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
226-233.e4
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564050511
Cited by
76
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA036541, R01DA031160, R01DA016575, R01DA001411)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
stimulant medication, nonmedical use, medical use, adolescents, ADHD medication, stimulant abuse, substance use disorders, educational attainment, long-term outcomes, high school seniors, Monitoring the Future
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Educational Status, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Prescription Drug Misuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review