Cited by 97Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Bumetanide for core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (BAMBI): a single center, double-blinded, participant-randomized, placebo-controlled, phase-2 superiority trial

Open access
Sprengers, Jan J., van Andel, Dorinde M., Zuithoff, Nicolaas P.A., Keijzer-Veen, Mandy G., Schulp, Annelien J.A., Scheepers, Floortje E., Lilien, Marc R., Oranje, Bob +1 more·2021·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent trials have indicated positive effects of bumetanide in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We tested efficacy of bumetanide on core symptom domains using a single center, parallel-group, participant-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase-2 superiority trial in a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. METHOD: Unmedicated children aged 7 to 15 years with ASD and IQ ≥55 were block-randomized 1:1 to oral-solution bumetanide versus placebo, titrated to a maximum of 1.0 mg twice daily for 91 days (D91), followed by a 28-day wash-out period. The primary outcome was difference in Social Responsiveness Scale-2 (SRS-2) total score at D91, analyzed by modified intention-to-treat with linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 92 participants (mean age 10.5 [SD 2.4] years) enrolled between June 2016 and December 2018. In all, 47 children were allocated to bumetanide and 45 to placebo. Two participants dropped out per treatment arm. After 91 days, bumetanide was not superior to placebo on the primary outcome, the SRS-2 (mean difference -3.16, 95% CI = -9.68 to 3.37, p = .338). A superior effect was found on one of the secondary outcomes, the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (mean difference -4.16, 95% CI = -8.06 to -0.25, p = .0375), but not on the Sensory Profile (mean difference 5.64, 95% CI = -11.30 to 22.57, p = .508) or the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability Subscale (mean difference -0.65, 95% CI = -2.83 to 1.52, p = .552). No significant wash-out effect was observed. Significant adverse effects were predominantly diuretic effects (orthostatic hypotension (17 [36%] versus 5 [11%], p = .007); hypokalemia (24 [51%] versus 0 [0%], p < .0001), the occurrence of which did not statistically influence treatment outcome. CONCLUSION: The trial outcome was negative in terms of no superior effect on the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes suggest efficacy on repetitive behavior symptoms for a subset of patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Bumetanide in Autism Medication and Biomarker Study (BAMBI); https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/; 2014-001560-35.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.07.888

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 superiority trial in children with ASD without severe intellectual disability did not show any treatment benefits on the core symptoms of ASD as measured on the SRS-2.

    “However, a recent double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 superiority trial in children with ASD without severe intellectual disability did not show any treatment benefits on the core symptoms of ASD as measured on the SRS-2 [97].”
  • The same trial showed treatment benefits on the repetitive behavior scale, with no major adverse effects.

    “It did show treatment benefits on the repetitive behavior scale, with no major adverse effects.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sprengers, J. J., van Andel, D. M., Zuithoff, N. P. A., Keijzer-Veen, M. G., Schulp, A. J. A., Scheepers, F. E., Lilien, M. R., Oranje, B., & Bruining, H.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Bruining, Hilgo
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
865-876
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045998212
Cited by
97
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (836041015)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
bumetanide, autism spectrum disorder, core symptoms, social responsiveness, repetitive behavior, sensory processing, irritability, diuretic adverse effects, orthostatic hypotension, hypokalemia, children and adolescents, sensory profile
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder, Bumetanide, Child, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Netherlands, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review