Cited by 210Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Measuring social communication behaviors as a treatment endpoint in individuals with autism spectrum disorder

Anagnostou, Evdokia, Jones, Nancy, Huerta, Marisela, Halladay, Alycia K, Wang, Paul, Scahill, Lawrence, Horrigan, Joseph P, Kasari, Connie +4 more·2015·Autism

Abstract

Social communication impairments are a core deficit in autism spectrum disorder. Social communication deficit is also an early indicator of autism spectrum disorder and a factor in long-term outcomes. Thus, this symptom domain represents a critical treatment target. Identifying reliable and valid outcome measures for social communication across a range of treatment approaches is essential. Autism Speaks engaged a panel of experts to evaluate the readiness of available measures of social communication for use as outcome measures in clinical trials. The panel held monthly conference calls and two face-to-face meetings over 14 months. Key criteria used to evaluate measures included the relevance to the clinical target, coverage of the symptom domain, and psychometric properties (validity and reliability, as well as evidence of sensitivity to change). In all, 38 measures were evaluated and 6 measures were considered appropriate for use, with some limitations. This report discusses the relative strengths and weaknesses of existing social communication measures for use in clinical trials and identifies specific areas in need of further development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361314542955

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A consensus panel found that the original ABC Lethargy-Social Withdrawal subscale had evidence supporting its use to assess social behavior in clinical trials involving persons with autism spectrum disorder.

    “We used the least-squares mean change from baseline in the ABC-mSW score as the primary outcome because a consensus panel found that the original ABC Lethargy–Social Withdrawal subscale had evidence supporting its use to assess social behavior in clinical trials involving persons with autism spectrum disorder34 and because the ABC-mSW increases specificity for social interaction.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anagnostou, E., Jones, N., Huerta, M., Halladay, A. K., Wang, P., Scahill, L., Horrigan, J. P., Kasari, C., Lord, C., Choi, D., Sullivan, K., & Dawson, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited, USA
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Autism Speaks (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Duke University, USA
Venue
Autism
Published
2014-08-05
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
622-636
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2155746365
Cited by
210
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Autism Speaks
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, social communication, outcome measures, treatment endpoints, clinical trials, psychometric properties, validity, reliability statistics, sensitivity to change, expert panel review
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Communication, Humans, Psychometrics, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review