Cited by 90Reproductive Health and TechnologiesAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Contraception

Long term cardiovascular risk in women prescribed fertility therapy

Open access
Udell, Jacob A., Lu, Hong, Redelmeier, Donald A.·2013·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of the study was to investigate whether fertility therapy might contribute to subsequent cardiovascular disease.Background Fertility medications are used for 1% of births yet may also lead to endothelial injury with long-term adverse consequences for the mother.Methods A population-based cohort analysis was performed of women who gave birth in Ontario, Canada, between July 1, 1993, and March 31, 2010, distinguishing those who did and did not receive fertility therapy in the 2 years before delivery. Cox proportional models were derived to estimate hazard ratios with and without adjustment for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was a composite cardiovascular endpoint of death, nonfatal coronary ischemia, stroke, transient ischemic attack, thromboembolism, or heart failure.Results Among 1,186,753 women who delivered during the study period, 6,979 gave birth after fertility therapy. After 9.7 years of median follow-up, women who delivered after fertility therapy had fewer cardiovascular events than controls (103 vs. 117 events per 100,000 person-years), equivalent to an unadjusted hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 1.29, p = 0.79) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.41 to 0.74, p < 0.0001). An apparent relative lower risk was observed across all age and income groups. Women who received fertility therapy also had lower risk-adjusted all-cause mortality, thromboembolic events, subsequent depression, alcoholism, and self-harm (p < 0.01 for each).Conclusions Successful fertility therapy was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease later in life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.085

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • IVF was reported in 4 of the 6 included studies.

    “IVF was reported in 4 of the 6 included studies (23,25,27,34).”

    From Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Included studies were population-based retrospective cohort studies (n=2), secondary analysis of the Nurses' Health Study II cohort (n=1), and a single nested case-cohort study that resulted in 2 publications (n=2).

    “Studies included were populationbased retrospective cohort studies (n ¼ 2) (28,34), secondary analysis of the longitudinal Nurses' Health Study II cohort (n ¼ 1) (25), and a single nested casecohort study that resulted in 2 publications (n ¼ 2):”

    From Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Repeated cycles of ovarian hyperstimulation and associated hyperestrogenemia may cause endothelial injury by affecting the renin-angiotensin system.

    “Repeated cycles of ovarian hyperstimulation and associated hyperestrogenemia contribute to a prothrombotic state (23) and may also cause endothelial injury by affecting the renin-angiotensin system (24,25).”

    From Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Both IVF and non-IVF approaches often involve repeated cycles of high-dose hormonal stimulation protocols, which lead to potential fluid shifts, endothelial dysfunction, and a prothrombotic state.

    “Both IVF and non-IVF approaches often involve repeated cycles of high-dose hormonal stimulation protocols, which lead to potential fluid shifts, endothelial dysfunction, and a prothrombotic state (23)(24)(25).”

    From Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Both Farland et al. and Udell et al. reported a reduced risk of incident hypertension in fertility-treated women compared with women without such treatment.

    “Both Farland et al. (25) and Udell et al. (28) reported a reduced risk of incident hypertension in fertility-treated women compared with women without such treatment, whereas Westerlund et al. (27) found a significant 27% increase in this risk.”

    From Cardiovascular Risk Following Fertility Therapy (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Binder H, Dittrich R, Einhaus F, et al. Update on ovarian hyper- stimulation syndrome: part 1dincidence and pathogenesis. Int J Fertil Womens Med 2007;52:11-26.
  2. Heffner LJ. Advanced maternal agedhow old is too old? N Engl J Med 2004;351:1927-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Udell, J. A., Lu, H., & Redelmeier, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Udell, Jacob A.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
62
Issue
18
Pages
1704-1712
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014612640
Cited by
90
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • Canadian Foundation for Women’s Health
  • CHEST Foundation
  • Respiratory Health Association of Metropolitan Chicago
  • Canada Research Chair in Medical Decision Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
cardiovascular disease, long-term cardiovascular risk, women, endothelial injury, thromboembolism, stroke, myocardial ischemia, heart failure, all-cause mortality, depression, alcoholism, self-harm
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Cardiovascular Diseases, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infertility, Female, Ontario, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Thromboembolism, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Self-Injurious Behavior, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review