Cited by 24Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope

Open access
Varosy, Paul D., Chen, Lin Y., Miller, Amy L., Noseworthy, Peter A., Slotwiner, David J., Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Venkatesh·2017·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives To determine, using systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether pacing reduces risk of recurrent syncope and relevant clinical outcomes among adult patients with reflex-mediated syncope.Methods MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through October 7, 2015) were searched for randomized trials and observational studies examining pacing and syncope, and the bibliographies of known systematic reviews were also examined. Studies were rejected for poor-quality study methods and for the lack of the population, intervention, comparator, or outcome(s) of interest.Results Of 3,188 citations reviewed, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review, including a total of 676 patients. These included 9 randomized trials and 1 observational study. Of the 10 studies, 4 addressed patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity, and the remaining 6 addressed vasovagal syncope. Among the 6 open-label (unblinded) studies, we found that pacing was associated with a 70% reduction in recurrent syncope (relative risk [RR]: 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.60). When the 2 analyzable studies with double-blinded methodology were considered separately, there was no clear benefit (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.25-2.1), but confidence intervals were wide. The strongest evidence was from the randomized, double-blinded ISSUE-3 (Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology) trial, which demonstrated a benefit of pacing among patients with recurrent syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.Conclusions There are limited data with substantive evidence of outcome ascertainment bias, and only 2 studies with a double-blinded study design have been conducted. The evidence does not support the use of pacing for reflex-mediated syncope beyond patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.004

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The recommendation in Section 5.2 was based on a separately commissioned systematic review of the available evidence.

    “As noted in Section 1.1, the recommendation in this section was based on a separately commissioned systematic review of the available evidence, the results of which were used to frame our decision making. Full details are provided in the ERC’s systematic review report (9).”
  • Although syncope occurs in patients with POTS, it is relatively infrequent, and there is little evidence that the syncope is due to POTS.

    “Although syncope occurs in patients with POTS, it is relatively infrequent, and there is little evidence that the syncope is due to POTS (9,10).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]18. Romme J.J.C.M., Reitsma J.B., Black C.N. et al: Drugs and pacemakers for vasovagal, carotid sinus and situational syncope (Review). : The Cochrane Collaboration, Published in the Cochrane Library 2013. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0016226/. Accessed March 1, 2017. Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varosy, P. D., Chen, L. Y., Miller, A. L., Noseworthy, P. A., Slotwiner, D. J., & Thiruganasambandamoorthy, V.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
664-679
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023455871
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
cardiac pacing, vasovagal syncope, carotid sinus hypersensitivity, situational syncope, recurrent syncope, asystole, implantable loop recorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review