Cited by 91Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Carotid sinus syndrome, should we pace? A multicentre, randomised control trial (Safepace 2)

Ryan, D. J, Nick, S., Colette, S. M, Roseanne, K.·2010·Heart

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardioinhibitory carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CICSH) is highly prevalent among older people with falls. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of dual-chamber pacing in older patients with CICSH and unexplained falls. DESIGN: A multicentre, double blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Selection from emergency room, geriatric medicine and orthopaedic departments. PATIENTS: Patients aged >50 years, with two unexplained falls and/or one syncopal event in the previous 12 months for which no other cause is evident apart from CICSH. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomised to either a 700/400 kappa, rate responsive pacemaker or implantable loop recorder (Medtronic Reveal thera RDR, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number falls after implantation. Secondary outcomes were time to fall event, presyncope, quality of life and cognitive function. RESULTS: 141 patients were recruited from 22 centres. Mean age was 78 years and mean follow-up 24 months. The overall relative risk of falling after device implantation compared with before was 0.23 (0.15 to 0.32). No significant reduction in falls was seen between paced and loop recorder groups (RR=0.79; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.50). Data were also consistent in both groups for syncope, quality of life and cognitive function. Conclusions These results question the use of pacing in CICSH. However, the study was underpowered and also patient characteristics differed from those in Safepace 1-participants were physically and cognitively frailer. Further work is necessary to assess cardiac pacing in this setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/hrt.2009.176206

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with unexplained falls, an attack could have been documented by ILR in 70% of patients, with an arrhythmic cause being responsible in 14%.

    “Patients with unexplained falls: in pooled data, an attack could have been documented by ILR in 70% of patients, with an arrhythmic cause being responsible in 14% 191-194”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryan, D. J., Nick, S., Colette, S. M., & Roseanne, K.
Affiliations
  • St. James's Hospital (IE)
  • Freeman Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Ryan, D. J
Venue
Heart
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-11-23
Volume
96
Issue
5
Pages
347-351
ISSN
1355-6037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125194790
Cited by
91
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
carotid sinus syndrome, DDD pacing, implantable loop recorder, falls in older adults, syncope, fall prevention, rate-responsive pacemaker, quality of life, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Carotid Sinus, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Pacemaker, Artificial, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Syncope, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review