Cited by 27Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychology and Mental Health

Actions that young people can take to prevent depression, anxiety and psychosis: beliefs of health professionals and young people

Jorm, Anthony F., Morgan, Amy J., Wright, Annemarie·2010·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Members of the public know about actions they can take to prevent major physical diseases, but there has been less attention to the public's capacity to take action to prevent mental disorders. Since mental disorders often have first onset during youth, young people's beliefs about prevention are of particular relevance.Methods Young people's prevention beliefs were assessed by a national telephone survey of 3746 Australian youth aged 12-25 years. To allow a comparison with professional beliefs, postal surveys were carried out with 470 GPs, 591 psychiatrists, 736 psychologists and 522 mental health nurses. Respondents were asked to rate the helpfulness of 9 potential strategies in relation to the prevention of four disorders: depression, depression with alcohol misuse, social phobia and psychosis.Results Both young people and professionals believed that mental disorders could be prevented by physical activity, keeping contact with family and friends, avoiding use of substances, and making time for relaxing activities. However, professionals disagreed with young people about the benefits of avoiding stressful situations, particularly for social phobia. Professionals were also less optimistic about the prevention of psychosis than depression and anxiety.Limitations The surveys assessed beliefs, but not actual use of preventive strategies.Conclusions Given the beliefs of young people and professionals that prevention is possible, there is fertile ground for health promotion in this area. However, young people need to be aware that avoiding stressful situations may not be helpful for anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2010.03.011

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jorm, A. F., Morgan, A. J., & Wright, A.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Jorm, Anthony F.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
126
Issue
1-2
Pages
278-281
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019312478
Cited by
27
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental disorder prevention, youth, health professionals' beliefs, depression, anxiety, psychosis, social anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, physical activity, substance use avoidance, stress avoidance, health promotion, primary care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcoholism, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Australia, Child, Depressive Disorder, Health Surveys, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Psychotic Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review