Cited by 144Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

Does negative religious coping accompany, precede, or follow depression among Orthodox Jews?

Open access
Pirutinsky, Steven, Rosmarin, David H., Pargament, Kenneth I., Midlarsky, Elizabeth·2011·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cross sectional research suggests that negative religious coping (e.g., anger at God and religious disengagement) strongly correlates with depression and anxiety. However, causality is difficult to establish as negative coping can accompany, cause, or result from distress. Among Orthodox Jews, some studies have found correlations between negative religious coping and anxiety and depression, while others found that high levels of negative coping related with decreased distress. We therefore examined longitudinal relationships between negative coping and depressive symptoms among Orthodox Jews. METHODS Participants (80 Orthodox Jews) completed the Jewish Religious Coping Scale and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies' Depression Scale at two times. Using Structural Equation Modeling, we compared four models describing possible causal patterns. RESULTS Negative religious coping and depressive symptoms were linearly related. Furthermore, a model including negative coping as a predictor of future depression fit the data best and did not significantly differ from a saturated model. LIMITATIONS This research was limited by reliance on self-report measures, an internet sample, and examination of only negative religious coping. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with a "primary spiritual struggles" conceptualization, negative religious coping appears to precede and perhaps cause future depression among Orthodox Jews. Clinical interventions should target spiritual struggles, and more research integrating this construct into theory and practice is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.015

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pirutinsky, S., Rosmarin, D. H., Pargament, K. I., & Midlarsky, E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
401-405
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068726258
Cited by
144
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
negative religious coping, depression, Orthodox Jews, longitudinal associations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Ethnicity, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Jews, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review