Cited by 912Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipCancer survivorship and care

Religious Coping Methods as Predictors of Psychological, Physical and Spiritual Outcomes among Medically Ill Elderly Patients: A Two-year Longitudinal Study

Pargament, Kenneth I., Koenig, Harold G., Tarakeshwar, Nalini, Hahn, June·2004·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

A total of 268 medically ill, elderly, hospitalized patients responded to measures of religious coping and spiritual, psychological and physical functioning at baseline and follow-up two years later. After controlling for relevant variables, religious coping was significantly predictive of spiritual outcome, and changes in mental and physical health. Generally, positive methods of religious coping (e.g. seeking spiritual support, benevolent religious reappraisals) were associated with improvements in health. Negative methods of religious coping (e.g. punishing God reappraisal, interpersonal religious discontent) were predictive of declines in health. Patients who continue to struggle with religious issues over time may be particularly at risk for health-related problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105304045366

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inter-rater agreement on whether study quality was low or high was kappa = 0.49, indicating good agreement.

    “The kappa of agreement (κ) between the two raters was 0.49 (where kappas of 0.40 to 0.75 indicate good agreement [26]).”
  • Of the 178 highest-rigor studies on R/S and depression, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression.

    “Of the 178 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships [124–135] and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression [136–148].”
  • Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level).

    “Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University, USA
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2004-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
713-730
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W1981610704
Cited by
912
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 41
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
religious coping
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Psychology, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review