Cited by 435Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Ruminative thought style and depressed mood

Brinker, Jay K., Dozois, David J.A.·2009·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that the measure most commonly used to assess rumination, the Response Style Questionnaire (RSQ; L. D. Butler & S. Nolen-Hoeksema, 1994), may be heavily biased by depressive symptoms, thereby restricting the scope of research exploring this construct. This article offers a broader conceptualization of rumination, which includes positive, negative, and neutral thoughts as well as past and future-oriented thoughts. The first two studies describe the development and evaluation of the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire (RTS), a psychometrically sound measure of the general tendency to ruminate. Further, the scale is comprised of a single factor and shows high internal consistency, suggesting that rumination does encompasses the factors mentioned. The final study involved a longitudinal diary investigation of rumination and mood over time. Results suggest that the RTS assesses a related, but separate, construct than does the RSQ. RTS scores predicted future depressed mood beyond the variance accounted for by initial depressed mood whereas RSQ scores did not. The implications of these results and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.20542

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brinker, J. K., & Dozois, D. J. A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Brinker, Jay K.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2057726282
Cited by
435
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
rumination, depressive mood, scale development, psychometric properties, construct validity, diary study
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Self-Assessment, Stress, Psychological, Students, Thinking, Universities, Self Psychology, Principal Component Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review