Cited by 51Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Cognitive tolerability following successful long term treatment of major depression and anxiety disorders with SSRi antidepressants.

Popovic, Dina, Vieta, Eduard, Fornaro, Michele, Perugi, Giulio·2015·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background The present study aims to evaluate cognitive tolerability profile of SSRIs in long-term treatment. The secondary aim is to explore differences of side effects profile between patients with major depression (MD) and anxiety disorders (AD).Methods Sixty-seven consecutive patients, successfully treated with SSRIs in monotherapy for at least six months for MD or AD, were assessed for side effects, with a special focus on cognition.Results Over 20% of MD and AD patients in long term treatment with SSRIs reported cognitive symptoms including fatigue, inattentiveness, lack of concentration, memory impairment and apathy. Recall memory impairment, attention deficit and somnolence were most frequently rated as moderate or severe. There were no significant differences in SSRI cognitive side effects profile between MD and AD patients.Limitations Subjective measure of cognitive functioning, limited sample size, lack of a control group.Conclusions A large proportion of depressed and anxious patients treated successfully with SSRIs for over six months reported cognitive, affective, motivational symptoms. These symptoms are likely to represent SSRI side effects rather than residual depressive symptomatology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.008

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popovic, D., Vieta, E., Fornaro, M., & Perugi, G.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
173
Pages
211-215
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166399477
Cited by
51
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Carlos III Institute, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CD13/00149)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive side effects, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, long-term antidepressant treatment, memory impairment, attention deficits, sleepiness, fatigue, apathy, residual depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review