Cited by 36Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Venlafaxine treatment reduces the deficit of executive control of attention in patients with major depressive disorder

Open access
Tian, Yanghua, Du, Jing, Spagna, Alfredo, Mackie, Melissa-Ann, Gu, Xiaosi, Dong, Yi, Fan, Jin, Wang, Kai·2016·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Attention plays an essential role in supporting other cognitive functions and behavior and disturbance of attention is one of the most common symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD). Although treatment with venlafaxine for MDD symptoms has been shown to reduce deficits in cognition and emotion regulation, it remains unclear whether venlafaxine improves specific attentional functions. We used the Attention Network Test to measure the attentional functions of alerting, orienting and executive control before and after treatment with venlafaxine in patients with MDD compared to untreated healthy controls. Before treatment, the MDD group showed a selective impairment in alerting and executive control of attention, while there were no significant group differences in the orienting function. The interaction between group and session was significant for executive control and after treatment with venlafaxine, the performance of the MDD group on executive control of attention was not significantly different from that of controls. Reported symptoms of MDD were also significantly reduced after treatment with venlafaxine. These results demonstrate that treatment with venlafaxine selectively normalizes the executive control function of attention in addition to improving clinical symptoms in MDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep28028

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective noradrenergic agonists, including SNRIs, atomoxetine, and alpha2 agonists, have been shown to improve selective and sustained attention in some studies but not all.

    “Selective noradrenergic agonists, including serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), atomoxetine, and the alpha2 agonists have been shown to improve selective121 and sustained attention in some studies103,122, but not all123,124.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [122]

  • Some studies found improvements in selective attention with venlafaxine and with duloxetine, but the results have been mixed.

    “Some studies have found improvements in selective attention with venlafaxine122 and with duloxetine125, but the results have been mixed99,100.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fan J.. Quantitative characterization of functional anatomical contributions to cognitive control under uncertainty. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26, 1490– 1506, 10.1162/jocn_a_00554 (2014). 24392900 PMC5070967 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, Y., Du, J., Spagna, A., Mackie, M.-A., Gu, X., Dong, Y., Fan, J., & Wang, K.
Affiliations
  • Anhui Medical University (CN)
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • Anhui Mental Health Center (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Kai
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2016-06-16
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
28028-28028
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2427060740
Cited by
36
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471117, 91432301)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
venlafaxine, major depressive disorder, attention deficits, alerting, orienting, Attention Network Test, antidepressant treatment, cognitive function
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review