Cited by 167Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Transdiagnostic mechanisms in depression and anxiety: The role of rumination and attentional control

Open access
Hsu, Kean J., Beard, Courtney, Rifkin, Lara, Dillon, Daniel G., Pizzagalli, Diego A., Björgvinsson, Thröstur·2015·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Deficits in attentional control have been hypothesized to cause rumination, suggesting that the relationships between attentional control and clinical symptoms may be mediated in part by rumination. However, to date, no clinical study has examined these constructs transdiagnostically in a path analysis model.Methods Fifty-one adults presenting for treatment completed measures of self-reported attentional control, rumination, and depression and anxiety symptoms. A bias-corrected path analysis-based approach was employed to test whether indirect (i.e., mediating) effects of rumination were significantly associated with the direct effects of attentional control on depression and anxiety symptoms. Separate models for depression and anxiety symptoms were tested along with reverse models using attentional control as a proposed mediator.Results The relationship between attentional control and clinical symptomatology (i.e., both depression and anxiety symptoms) was mediated by rumination. Poor attentional control was associated with more rumination and consequently more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. The reverse relationship (i.e., attentional control mediating the relationship between rumination and depression or anxiety symptoms) was not significant.Limitations Study design did not allow testing of temporal precedence for the mediation models. All constructs were assessed via self-report.Conclusions Attentional control appears to impact depression and anxiety symptoms through rumination. The pathway between poor attentional control and emotion dysregulation via rumination suggests that interventions targeting attentional control may decrease maladaptive ruminative processes, leading to improved emotion regulation and reduced clinical symptomatology. Future studies should examine the stability of this mediational relationship over time (and in the face of targeted interventions).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.008

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, K. J., Beard, C., Rifkin, L., Dillon, D. G., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Björgvinsson, T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hsu, Kean J.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
188
Pages
22-27
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1813114717
Cited by
167
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH094438)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
rumination, attentional control, depression, anxiety, transdiagnostic mechanisms, mediation, emotional dysregulation, emotion regulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Young Adult, Self Report, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review