Cited by 506Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Cognitive processes in social anxiety: the effects of self-focus, rumination and anticipatory processing

Mellings, Tanna M.B, Alden, Lynn E·2000·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

We examined three cognitive processes hypothesized to contribute to biases in judgments about and memory for social events: self-focused attention, post-event rumination, and anticipatory processing. Socially anxious (N = 58) and nonanxious (N = 58) subjects participated in a social interaction and then completed measures of self-focused attention and anxiety-related physiological sensations and behavior. The next day, subjects completed measures that assessed frequency of post-event processing and recall of the interaction. The results indicated that selective attention to negative self-related information led to biases in social judgments and recollections and that post-event processing contributed to the recall of negative self-related information. No evidence was found for selective retrieval of negative self-related information prior to a second social interaction. The results reconcile inconsistent previous findings related to memory bias in social anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00040-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mellings and Alden (2000) found that post-event worry/rumination in high socially anxious subjects predicted recall of negative self-relevant information, negative self-judgements and recall of anxiety symptoms on anticipation of a subsequent social interaction.

    “Mellings and Alden (2000) found that post-event worry/rumination in high socially anxious subjects predicted recall of negative selfrelevant information, negative self-judgements and recall of anxiety symptoms on anticipation of a subsequent social interaction.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mellings, T. M. B., & Alden, L. E.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Alden, Lynn E
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
243-257
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062470464
Cited by
506
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
social anxiety, self-focus, post-event rumination, anticipatory processing, memory bias, social judgment, self-related information, selective attention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Anxiety, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Ego, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Memory, Phobic Disorders, Random Allocation, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Self Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review