Cited by 58Treatment of Major DepressionPhysical Activity and HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Efficacy of exercise as an adjunct treatment for clinically depressed inpatients during the initial stages of antidepressant pharmacotherapy: an open randomized controlled trial.

Legrand, Fabien D., Neff, Elise M.·2016·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Physical exercise as adjunctive treatment for hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) has been of increasing interest in the past few years. While preliminary findings are promising, these prior studies have been plagued by inclusion of participants at different stages of medication use at study entry. The present study evaluates the effects of a short (10-days) add-on endurance-training intervention in hospitalized MDD patients on antidepressant medication for less than two weeks.Method Thirty-five participants were randomly assigned to one of three study groups: aerobic exercise (n=14), placebo (stretching) exercise (n=11), or no intervention (control; n=10). The study outcome was the change in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) total score from baseline to the end of the study period.Results The intent-to-treat analysis showed significant improvements in BDI-II scores for both the aerobic and the stretching groups. However, comparing pre- to post-study depression changes in these two groups, we found a large effect size in favor of aerobic exercise (Cohen's d=-1.06). No significant change in depressive symptoms was found in the control group.Limitations The nature of the intervention (i.e., exercise) meant blinding participants to treatments was not possible. Precise information on medication dosage was not available, and the short duration of interventions and lack of follow-up assessment were all limitations.Conclusions Endurance-training can be a helpful adjunct treatment for hospitalized patients with severe affective disorders in the initial stages of pharmacotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.047

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Legrand, F. D., & Neff, E. M.
Affiliations
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Corresponding author
Legrand, Fabien D.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
191
Pages
139-144
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187738869
Cited by
58
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
exercise therapy, major depressive disorder, hospitalized patients, antidepressant treatment, aerobic exercise, endurance training, stretching, adjunctive therapy, depression severity, Beck Depression Inventory
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Exercise, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review