Cited by 85Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Cognitive biases predict symptoms of depression, anxiety and wellbeing above and beyond neuroticism in adolescence

Open access
Smith, Eilidh M, Reynolds, Shirley, Orchard, Faith, Whalley, Heather C, Chan, Stella WY·2018·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Adolescence represents a period of vulnerability to affective disorders. Neuroticism is considered a heritable risk factor for depression, but is not directly amenable to intervention. Therefore, it is important to identify the contributions of modifiable risk factors. Negative cognitive biases are implicated in the onset and maintenance of affective disorders in adults, and may represent modifiable risk factors in adolescence.Aim(s) This study sought to assess to what extent cognitive biases are able to predict depression, anxiety and wellbeing beyond that of neuroticism in adolescents.Methods Adolescents (N = 99), recruited from Scottish secondary schools (54.5% female; mean age = 14.7), ensured a sample representing the breadth of the mental health spectrum. In line with prevalence estimates, 18% of this sample demonstrated clinical levels of depression symptoms. Cognitive biases of autobiographical memory, self-referential memory, ambiguous scenarios interpretation, facial expression recognition, rumination and dysfunctional attitudes were assessed. Depression, anxiety, and wellbeing were indexed using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, Spence Children's Anxiety Scale and the BBC Subjective Wellbeing Scale.Results Regression analyses demonstrated neuroticism to significantly predict depression, anxiety and wellbeing. The addition of cognitive biases resulted in a significant increase of explained variance with final models explaining just over 50% of variances of depression, anxiety and wellbeing.Conclusion These findings demonstrate that cognitive biases explain mental health symptoms over and above that of neuroticism. Depressive symptomology was particularly related to self-referential memory bias, while anxiety was predicted by interpretive bias. The key clinical implication is that targeting specific biases based on diagnostic features may be of particular benefit in alleviating distress and promoting wellbeing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.051

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several emotional states and traits, such as neuroticism, negative self-concept (with self-perceptions of worthlessness and uselessness), and negative interpretation or attention biases have been linked to depression.

    “Several emotional states and traits, such as neuroticism [235,260,271,278], negative self-concept (with self-perceptions of worthlessness and uselessness), and negative interpretation or attention biases have been linked to depression [261,271,282,283,286].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Dunn, V., and Goodyer, I.M., (2006) Longitudinal investigation into child-and adolescenceonset depression: psychiatric outcome in early adulthood, The British Journal of Psychiatry , 188(3):216-222
  2. Joormann, J., and Vanderlind, M.W., (2014) Emotional Regulation in Depression. The role of biased cognition and reduced cognitive control, Clinical Psychological Science 2(4):402-421
  3. Marcia, J.E., (1980) Identity in adolescence in Adelson, J., (Ed.) Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 159-187
  4. Mor, N., and Winquist, J., (2002) Self-focused attention and negative affect: A metaanalysis, Psychological Bulletin , 128(4):638-62
  5. Sadler, M.E., Miller, C.J., Christensen, K., and McGue, M., (2011) Subjective well-being and longevity: A cotwin control study, Twin Research and Human Genetic: The Official Journal of the International Society for Twins , 14(3):249-256
  6. Tang, T.Z., DeRubeis, R.J., Hollon, S.D., Amsterdam, J., Shelton, R., and Schalet, B., (2009) A placebo-controlled test of the effects of paroxetine and cognitive therapy on personality risk factors in depression, Archives of General Psychiatry , 66(12):13221330
  7. Williams, J.M.G., Watts, F.N., MacLeod, C., and Matthews, A., (1997) Cognitive Psychology and Emotional Disorders (second edition), Wiley and Sons, England World Health Organisation, (2013), Mental Health Action Plan: 2013-2020, ISBN: 978 92 4 150602

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, E. M., Reynolds, S., Orchard, F., Whalley, H. C., & Chan, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Smith, Eilidh M
  • Chan, Stella WY
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
241
Pages
446-453
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887623273
Cited by
83
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • JMAS SIM
  • ESAT College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
cognitive biases, neuroticism, depression, anxiety, well-being, adolescents, interpretation bias, rumination, facial expression recognition, dysfunctional attitudes, modifiable risk factors, mood disorders
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review