Cited by 123Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Understanding the effects of emotional reactivity on depression and suicidal thoughts and behaviors: Moderating effects of childhood adversity and resilience

Shapero, Benjamin G., Farabaugh, Amy, Terechina, Olga, DeCross, Stephanie, Cheung, Joey C., Fava, Maurizio, Holt, Daphne J.·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Early adulthood is a period of increased risk for depression and suicide. Emotional reactivity (a tendency to react to stress with increases in negative affect and maladaptive interpretations of events) is an important risk factor for these outcomes that has been under-studied. We hypothesized that elevated emotional reactivity would be associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Further, we hypothesized that experiences of childhood maltreatment would amplify this relationship, whereas the presence of resilience would act as a buffer. Methods 1703 young adults (Mean Age = 19.56 years), 71% female) completed well-validated self-report questionnaires at a single time point. Results Higher emotional reactivity was directly associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Further, resilience levels significantly moderated the relationships between emotional reactivity and depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Finally, childhood trauma significantly moderated the relationship between emotional reactivity and suicidal thoughts and behaviors only. Limitations This study was cross-sectional in design and relied upon self-report measures only. Conclusions The current study demonstrates an association between emotional reactivity, depressive symptoms, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors during emerging adulthood. Whereas a history of childhood maltreatment may amplify t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.033

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapero, B. G., Farabaugh, A., Terechina, O., DeCross, S., Cheung, J. C., Fava, M., & Holt, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Shapero, Benjamin G.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
245
Pages
419-427
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899732873
Cited by
123
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
FWCI
11.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
MGH
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotional reactivity, depression, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, childhood adversity, child abuse, resilience, moderating effect, emerging adulthood, early adulthood, negative affect, stress reactivity
MeSH terms
Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Self Report, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review